Cited by 1,098Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlImmune Response and Inflammation

Glucosinolate Metabolites Required for an Arabidopsis Innate Immune Response

Open access
Clay, Nicole K., Adio, Adewale M., Denoux, Carine, Jander, Georg, Ausubel, Frederick M.·2009·Science

Abstract

The perception of pathogen or microbe-associated molecular pattern molecules by plants triggers a basal defense response analogous to animal innate immunity and is defined partly by the deposition of the glucan polymer callose at the cell wall at the site of pathogen contact. Transcriptional and metabolic profiling in Arabidopsis mutants, coupled with the monitoring of pathogen-triggered callose deposition, have identified major roles in pathogen response for the plant hormone ethylene and the secondary metabolite 4-methoxy-indol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate. Two genes, PEN2 and PEN3 , are also necessary for resistance to pathogens and are required for both callose deposition and glucosinolate activation, suggesting that the pathogen-triggered callose response is required for resistance to microbial pathogens. Our study shows that well-studied plant metabolites, previously identified as important in avoiding damage by herbivores, are also required as a component of the plant defense response against microbial pathogens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1164627

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. [1]Thordal-Christensen H Curr Opin Plant Biol 6 351 2003 12873530
  2. [2]Mysore KS Ryu CM Trends Plant Sci 9 97 2004 15102376
  3. [3]Nürnberger T Lipka V Mol Plant Pathol 6 335 2005 20565662
  4. [4]Gomez-Gomez L Boller T Trends Plant Sci 7 251 2002 12049921
  5. [5]Nürnberger T Kemmerling B Trends Plant Sci 11 519 2006 17030146
  6. [6]Denoux C Mol Plant 1 423 2008 PMC2954645 19825551
  7. [7]Halkier BA Gershenzon J Annu Rev Plant Biol 57 303 2006 16669764
  8. [8]Tierens KFMJ Plant Physiol 125 1688 2001 11299350 PMC88826
  9. [9]Pedras MSC Zheng QA Gadagi RS Chem Commun 368 2007 17220973
  10. [11]Gomez-Gomez L Boller T Mol Cell 5 1003 2000 10911994
  11. [12]Nishimura MT Science 301 969 2003 12920300
  12. [13]Heese A Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 12217 2007 17626179 PMC1924592
  13. [14]Chinchilla D Nature 448 497 2007 17625569
  14. [15]Schaller GE Bleecker AB Science 270 1809 1995 8525372
  15. [16]Alonso JM Hirayama T Roman G Nourizadeh S Ecker JR Science 284 2148 1999 10381874
  16. [17]Gigolashvili T Plant J 50 886 2007 17461791
  17. [18]Celenza JL Plant Physiol 137 253 2005 15579661 PMC548856
  18. [19]Niyogi KK Fink GR Plant Cell 4 721 1992 1392592 PMC160168
  19. [20]Stepanova AN Hoyt JM Hamilton AA Alonso JM Plant Cell 17 2230 2005 15980261 PMC1182485
  20. [21]Zhao Y Genes Dev 16 3100 2002 12464638 PMC187496
  21. [22]Haughn GW Davin L Giblin M Underhill EW Plant Physiol 97 217 1991 16668374 PMC1080987
  22. [23]Kim JH Durrett TP Last RL Jander G Plant Mol Biol 54 671 2004 15356387
  23. [24]Hemm MR Ruegger MO Chapple C Plant Cell 15 179 2002 12509530 PMC143490
  24. [25]Gigolashvili T Yatusevich R Berger B Müller C Flügge UI Plant J 51 246 2007 17521412
  25. [28]Radwanski ER Barczak AJ Last RL Mol Gen Genetics 253 353 1996 9003322
  26. [29]Nafisi M Plant Cell 19 2039 2007 17573535 PMC1955726
  27. [30]Schuhegger R Plant Physiol 141 1248 2007 16766671 PMC1533948
  28. [31]Burmeister WP Cottaz S Rollin P Vasella A Henrissat B J Biol Chem 275 39385 2000 10978344
  29. [32]Conklin PL Saracco SA Norris SR Last RL Genetics 154 847 2000 10655235 PMC1460938
  30. [33]Barth C Jander G Plant J 46 549 2006 16640593
  31. [34]Collins NC Nature 425 973 2003 14586469
  32. [35]Lipka V Science 310 1180 2005 16293760
  33. [37]AM W PLOS Genetics 3 1687 2007 17941713 PMC1976331
  34. [38]Lambrix V Reichelt M Mitchell-Olds T Kliebenstein DJ Gershenzon J Plant Cell 13 2793 2006 11752388 PMC139489
  35. [39]Zhang Z Ober JA Kliebenstein DJ Plant Cell 18 1524 2006 16679459 PMC1475484
  36. [40]Wentzell AM Kliebenstein DJ Plant Physiol 147 415 2008 18359845 PMC2330308
  37. [41]Schlaeppi K Bodenhausen N Buchala A Mauch F Reymond P Plant J 55 774 2008 18466300
  38. [42]Parisy V Plant J 49 159 2007 17144898
  39. [43]Howden R Andersen CR Goldsbrough PB Cobbett CS Plant Physiol 107 1067 1995 7770518 PMC157238
  40. [44]Grill E Löffler S Winnacker EL Zenk MH Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86 6838 1989 16594069 PMC297945
  41. [45]Howden R Cobbett CS Plant Physiol 100 100 1992 16652930 PMC1075523
  42. [46]Ortiz DF Ruscitti T McCue KF Ow DW J Biol Chem 270 4721 1995 7876244
  43. [48]Rea PA Li ZS Lu YP Drozdowicz YM Martinoia E Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49 727 1998 15012252
  44. [49]Stein M Plant Cell 18 731 2006 16473969 PMC1383646
  45. [50]Kobae Y Plant Cell Physiol 47 309 2006 16415066
  46. [51]Kim DY Bovet L Maeshima M Martinola E Lee Y Plant J 50 207 2007 17355438
  47. [52]Debroy S Thilmony R Kwack YB Nomura K He SY Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 9927 2004 15210989 PMC470775
  48. [53]Uknes S Plant Cell 4 1992 PMC160161 1392589
  49. [54]Cazalé AC Clemens S FEBS Let 507 215 2001 11684101
  50. [55]Kim MG Cell 121 749 2005 15935761
  51. [56]Beaudoin N Serizet C Gosti F Giraudat J Plant Cell 12 1103 2000 10899977 PMC149052
  52. [57]Ghassemian M Plant Cell 12 1117 2000 10899978 PMC149053
  53. [58]Brader G Tas E Palva ET Plant Physiol 126 849 2001 11402212 PMC111174
  54. [59]Kliebenstein DJ Figuth A Mitchell-Olds T Genetics 161 1685 2002 12196411 PMC1462221
  55. [60]Mikkelsen MD Plant Physiol 131 298 2003 12529537 PMC166809

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clay, N. K., Adio, A. M., Denoux, C., Jander, G., & Ausubel, F. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ausubel, Frederick M.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-01-02
Volume
323
Issue
5910
Pages
95-101
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1995828353
Cited by
1,098
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 57
FWCI
68.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R37 GM48707, R37GM048707)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (F32AI066817)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
glucosinolates, plant innate immunity, callose deposition, Arabidopsis thaliana, ethylene, Pen-2, PEN3, pathogen resistance, plant defense signaling
MeSH terms
Ethylenes, Flagellin, Glucans, Glucosinolates, Glycoside Hydrolases, Hydrolysis, Immunity, Innate, Indoles, Mutation, N-Glycosyl Hydrolases, Peptide Fragments, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Genes, Plant, Arabidopsis, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Aminoacyltransferases, Salicylic Acid, Arabidopsis Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review