The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speech Perception by the Chinchilla: Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in Alveolar Plosive Consonants
Abstract
Four chinchillas were trained to respond differently to /t/ and /d/ consonant-vowel syllables produced by four talkers in three vowel contexts. This training generalized to novel instances, including synthetically produced /da/ and /ta/ (voice-onset times of 0 and +80 milliseconds, respectively). In a second experiment, synthetic stimuli with voice-onset times between 0 and +80 milliseconds were presented for identification. The form of the labeling functions and the "phonetic boundaries" for chinchillas and English-speaking adults were similar.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Animals also exhibited categorical perception; they demonstrated perceptual “boundaries” at locations where humans perceive a shift from one phonetic category to another (18, 19) (Fig. 3).”
From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Perception of the speech code.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020279 · Cited by 3,722
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.171.3968.303 · Cited by 2,154
Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors
Eimas, P. D., & Corbit, J. D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90006-6 · Cited by 472
Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops
Stevens, K. N., & Klatt, D. H. (1974) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1914578 · Cited by 337
Motor theory of speech perception: A reply to Lane's critical review.
Studdert‐Kennedy, M., Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., & Cooper, F. S. (1970) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0029078 · Cited by 309
The grammars of speech and language
Liberman, A. M. (1970) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(70)90018-6 · Cited by 252
Audibility Curve of the Chinchilla
Miller, J. D. (1970) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1912166 · Cited by 184
Self-citationSpeech perception by the chinchilla: discrimination of sustained ‖a‖ and ‖i‖
Burdick, C. K., & Miller, J. D. (1975) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.380686 · Cited by 96
Self-citationNew procedure for training chinchillas for psychoacoustic experiments
Burdick, C. K., & Miller, J. D. (1973) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1913661 · Cited by 2
Self-citationResidue Pitch as a Function of the Frequency Spacing between Components
Patterson, R. D. (1974) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3437349 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- LISKER, L, WORD-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL LINGUISTIC ASSOCIATION 20: 384 (1964).
- Lisker, L., Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences Prague 1967: 563 (1970).
- SPENNER, B. F., JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 55: 427 (1974).
- Stevens, K. N., Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory 2: 3 (1972).
- STREETER L THESIS COLUMBIA U (1974).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 · Cited by 5,189
The motor theory of speech perception revised
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6 · Cited by 2,970
Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code
Kuhl, P. K. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1533 · Cited by 2,291
Self-citationEmbodiment and Cognitive Science
Gibbs, R. W. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844 · Cited by 1,757
Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms
Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567 · Cited by 1,633
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhl, P. K., & Miller, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Central Institute for the Deaf (US)
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1975-10-03
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 4209
- Pages
- 69-72
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2022465033
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 18.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- speech perception, chinchilla, voice onset time, phonetic boundaries, generalization to novel stimuli
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Auditory Perception, Chinchilla, Conditioning, Psychological, Language, Phonetics, Speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
