Beyond the Data Deluge
Abstract
Is There a Scientific Digital Divide? Information Seeking in the International Context of Astronomy Research,
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sheer amount and heterogeneity of scientific data are already overwhelming for scientists.
“the sheer amount and heterogeneity of data are already overwhelming for scientists (Bell et al., 2009)”
From ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discovery (2024) · cites this paper as Bell et al., 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 8 · Cited by 537
- Authors
- Bell, G., Hey, T., & Szalay, A.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3701 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
- ORCID
- Hey, Tony
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2009-03-06
- Volume
- 323
- Issue
- 5919
- Pages
- 1297-1298
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1485293642
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 52.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Keywords
- information seeking, astronomical research, data deluge, research data management, international research collaboration, scholarly communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
