Cited by 540Cancer-related molecular mechanisms researchGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Aberrant Overexpression of Satellite Repeats in Pancreatic and Other Epithelial Cancers

Open access
Ting, David T., Lipson, Doron, Paul, Suchismita, Brannigan, Brian W., Akhavanfard, Sara, Coffman, Erik J., Contino, Gianmarco, Deshpande, Vikram +6 more·2011·Science

Abstract

Noncoding RNAs transcribed from DNA repeats in heterochromatin are expressed at surprisingly high levels in tumors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1200801

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Noncoding hSATII RNA is highly expressed in most cancer cells and tissues.

    “Previous reports demonstrated that noncoding hSATII RNA is highly expressed in most cancer cells and tissues (27–32).”

    From Chromatin conformational changes at human satellite II contribute to the senescence phenotype in the tumor microenvironment (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The paper reports high HSATII expression in human pancreatic cancers and in sampled lung, kidney, ovarian, and prostate cancers (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable). It does not establish that HSATII is highly expressed in most cancer cells or across most cancer tissues. Its finding of expression in all cells within tumors concerns mouse major satellite RNA, not human HSATII. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 540

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]Berretta J Morillon A EMBO Rep 10 973 2009 19680288 PMC2750061
  2. [2]Jacquier A Nat Rev Genet 10 833 2009 19920851
  3. [3]Guenatri M Bailly D Maison C Almouzni G J Cell Biol 166 493 2004 15302854 PMC2172221
  4. [4]Jurka J Cytogenet Genome Res 110 462 2005 16093699
  5. [5]Bouzinba-Segard H Guais A Francastel C Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 8709 2006 16731634 PMC1482643
  6. [6]Valgardsdottir R Nucleic Acids Res 36 423 2008 18039709 PMC2241877
  7. [7]Ugarkovic D EMBO Rep 6 1035 2005 16264428 PMC1371040
  8. [8]Carone DM Chromosoma 118 113 2009 18839199
  9. [9]Lipson D Nat Biotechnol 27 652 2009 19581875
  10. [10]Bardeesy N Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 5947 2006 16585505 PMC1458678
  11. [11]Kanellopoulou C Genes Dev 19 489 2005 15713842 PMC548949
  12. [12]Okada T Cell 131 1287 2007 18160038
  13. [13]Kuwabara T Nat Neurosci 12 1097 2009 19701198 PMC2764260
  14. [14]Bailey JA Carrel L Chakravarti A Eichler EE Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97 6634 2000 10841562 PMC18684
  15. [15]Montoya-Durango DE Mutat Res 665 20 2009 19427507 PMC3418809
  16. [16]Beck CR Cell 141 1159 2010 20602998 PMC3013285
  17. [17]Huang CR Cell 141 1171 2010 20602999 PMC2943426
  18. [18]Iskow RC Cell 141 1253 2010 20603005 PMC2943760
  19. [19]Dennis G Jr Genome Biol 4 P3 2003 12734009
  20. [20]Huang da W Sherman BT Lempicki RA Nat Protoc 4 44 2009 19131956
  21. [21]Tezel E Nagasaka T Nomoto S Sugimoto H Nakao A Cancer 89 2230 2000 11147593
  22. [22]Cindolo L Cantile M Vacherot F Terry S de la Taille A Urol Int 79 287 2007 18025844
  23. [23]Cloos PA Christensen J Agger K Helin K Genes Dev 22 1115 2008 18451103 PMC2732404

Authors
Ting, D. T., Lipson, D., Paul, S., Brannigan, B. W., Akhavanfard, S., Coffman, E. J., Contino, G., Deshpande, V., Iafrate, A. J., Letovsky, S., Rivera, M. N., Bardeesy, N., Maheswaran, S., & Haber, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Helicos Biosciences (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ting, David T.
  • Lipson, Doron
  • Haber, Daniel A.
Venue
Science
Published
2011-02-04
Volume
331
Issue
6017
Pages
593-596
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2056925335
Cited by
540
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 49
FWCI
15.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Cancer Institute (L30 CA142210, CA-129933, R01CA129933, P01CA117969)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
satellite repeats, pericentromeric heterochromatin, LINE-1 retrotransposons, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, epithelial cancers, non-coding RNA, gene silencing, tumor markers
MeSH terms
Animals, Carcinoma in Situ, Colonic Neoplasms, DNA, Neoplasm, DNA, Satellite, Female, Heterochromatin, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Mice, Nude, Neoplasms, Neurosecretory Systems, Ovarian Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, RNA, Neoplasm, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression, DNA Methylation, Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements, Gene Expression Profiling, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, RNA, Untranslated, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review