Making the Moon from a Fast-Spinning Earth: A Giant Impact Followed by Resonant Despinning
Abstract
A common origin for the Moon and Earth is required by their identical isotopic composition. However, simulations of the current giant impact hypothesis for Moon formation find that most lunar material originated from the impactor, which should have had a different isotopic signature. Previous Moon-formation studies assumed that the angular momentum after the impact was similar to that of the present day; however, Earth-mass planets are expected to have higher spin rates at the end of accretion. Here, we show that typical last giant impacts onto a fast-spinning proto-Earth can produce a Moon-forming disk derived primarily from Earth's mantle. Furthermore, we find that a faster-spinning early Earth-Moon system can lose angular momentum and reach the present state through an orbital resonance between the Sun and Moon.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Numerical simulations of a giant impact thought to have formed the Earth-Moon system suggest that over 50 vol% of the Earth's mantle could have melted, indicating a magma ocean to at least 600 km depth.
“however, numerical simulations of a giant impact thought to have formed the Earth-Moon system suggests that over 50 vol% of the Earth's mantle could have melted, indicating a magma ocean to at least 600 km depth”
From Secular change and the onset of plate tectonics on Earth (2020) · cites this paper as Ćuk and Stewart, 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 680
- Authors
- Ćuk, M., & Stewart, S. T.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ćuk, Matija
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2012-11-23
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 6110
- Pages
- 1047-1052
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2046557261
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 26.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
- Keywords
- Moon formation, giant impact hypothesis, impact velocity, Moon composition, Earth composition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review