Cited by 680Astro and Planetary SciencePlanetary Science and ExplorationHistory and Developments in Astronomy

Making the Moon from a Fast-Spinning Earth: A Giant Impact Followed by Resonant Despinning

Ćuk, Matija, Stewart, Sarah T.·2012·Science

Abstract

A common origin for the Moon and Earth is required by their identical isotopic composition. However, simulations of the current giant impact hypothesis for Moon formation find that most lunar material originated from the impactor, which should have had a different isotopic signature. Previous Moon-formation studies assumed that the angular momentum after the impact was similar to that of the present day; however, Earth-mass planets are expected to have higher spin rates at the end of accretion. Here, we show that typical last giant impacts onto a fast-spinning proto-Earth can produce a Moon-forming disk derived primarily from Earth's mantle. Furthermore, we find that a faster-spinning early Earth-Moon system can lose angular momentum and reach the present state through an orbital resonance between the Sun and Moon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1225542

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerical simulations of a giant impact thought to have formed the Earth-Moon system suggest that over 50 vol% of the Earth's mantle could have melted, indicating a magma ocean to at least 600 km depth.

    “however, numerical simulations of a giant impact thought to have formed the Earth-Moon system suggests that over 50 vol% of the Earth's mantle could have melted, indicating a magma ocean to at least 600 km depth”

    From Secular change and the onset of plate tectonics on Earth (2020) · cites this paper as Ćuk and Stewart, 2012

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 680

Authors
Ćuk, M., & Stewart, S. T.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ćuk, Matija
Venue
Science
Published
2012-11-23
Volume
338
Issue
6110
Pages
1047-1052
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2046557261
Cited by
680
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 5
FWCI
26.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
Moon formation, giant impact hypothesis, impact velocity, Moon composition, Earth composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review