CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 315Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchHistory and Developments in Astronomy

Stellar Spin-Orbit Misalignment in a Multiplanet System

Open access
Huber, Daniel, Carter, Joshua A., Barbieri, Mauro, Miglio, Andrea, Deck, Katherine M., Fabrycky, Daniel C., Montet, Benjamin T., Buchhave, Lars A. +27 more·2013·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.1242066
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Misaligned Planets: Stars with multiple coplanar planets have not been seen to show misalignments between the equatorial plane of the star and the orbital plane of the planets—a diagnostic of the dynamical history of planetary systems. Huber et al. (p. 331 ) analyzed the Kepler 56 planetary system, which contains a giant-sized and an intermediate-sized planet. The planets have orbits that are close to coplanar, but the planetary orbits are misaligned with the stellar equator. A third companion in a wide orbit, which could be another star or a planet, could explain the misaligned configuration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1242066

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kepler-56, which hosts two transiting giant planets, is a misaligned cool star.

    “Kepler-56, which hosts two transiting giant planets, is a misaligned cool star (Huber et al. 2013).”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Huber et al. 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [45]45. L. Gizon, et al. , Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 110 , 13267 (2013).
  2. [50]50. G. Houdek, Proceedings of SOHO 18/GONG 2006/HELAS I, Beyond the spherical Sun , K. Fletcher & M. Thompson, ed. (Noordwijk: ESA, 2006), vol. 624 of ESA Special Publication .
  3. [62]62. A. A. Djupvik, J. Andersen, Highlights of Spanish Astrophysics V , J. M. Diego, L. J. Goicoechea, J. I. Gonz´ alez-Serrano, J. Gorgas, eds. (Berlin: Springer, 2010), pp. 211-218.
  4. [73]73. A. Miglio, Red Giants as Probes of the Structure and Evolution of the Milky Way , A. Miglio, J. Montalb´ an, A. Noels, eds., ApSS Proceedings (Berlin: Springer, 2012).
  5. [77]77. K. Belkacem, SF2A-2012: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics , S. Boissier, et al. , eds. (2012), pp. 173-188.
  6. [78]78. A. Miglio, et al. , European Physical Journal Web of Conferences (2013), vol. 43 of European Physical Journal Web of Conferences , pp. 3004, DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20134303004. · DOI
  7. [95]95. S. S. Vogt, et al. , Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , D. L. Crawford, E. R. Craine, eds. (1994), vol. 2198 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , p. 362.
  8. [98]98. C. D. Murray, S. F. Dermott, Solar system dynamics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1999).
  9. [100]100. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery, Numerical recipes in C++ : the art of scientific computing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
  10. [102]102. D. Ragozzine, M. J. Holman, ArXiv e-prints (arXiv:1006.3727) (2010). · arXiv
  11. [103]103. W. H. Press, Comments on Astrophysics 7 , 103 (1978).
  12. [116]116. A. Nobili, I. Roxburgh, Relativity in celestial mechanics and astrometry: High precision dynamical theories and observational verifications: Proceedings of the Symposium, Leningrad, USSR, May 28-31, 1985 (Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1986), pp. 3105-110.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huber, D., Carter, J. A., Barbieri, M., Miglio, A., Deck, K. M., Fabrycky, D. C., Montet, B. T., Buchhave, L. A., Chaplin, W. J., Hekker, S., Montalbán, J., Sanchis-Ojeda, R., Basu, S., Bedding, T. R., Campante, T. L., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Elsworth, Y. P., Stello, D., Arentoft, T., Ford, E. B., Gilliland, R. L., Handberg, R., Howard, A. W., Isaacson, H., Johnson, J. A., Karoff, C., Kawaler, S. D., Kjeldsen, H., Latham, D. W., Lund, M. N., Lundkvist, M., Marcy, G. W., Metcalfe, T. S., Silva Aguirre, V., & Winn, J. N.
Affiliations
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (DE)
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Yale University (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Corresponding author
Huber, Daniel
ORCID
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2013-10-18
Volume
342
Issue
6156
Pages
331-334
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.1242066
OpenAlex
W2125948256
Cited by
315
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 4
FWCI
20.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/J001163/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
hot Jupiters, multi-planet systems, asteroseismology, red giants, planet migration, radial velocity, orbital torque

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review