The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Migratory Animals Couple Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning Worldwide
Open accessAbstract
Background: Every year, billions of migratory animals cross the planet in pursuit of increased foraging opportunities, improved safety, and higher reproductive output. In so doing, these migrants transport nutrients, energy, and other organisms (including seeds, mollusks, parasites, and pathogens) between disparate locations. Migrants also forage and are preyed upon throughout their journeys, thereby establishing transport and trophic interactions with resident communities. Migratory animals thus couple ecological communities across the globe and may mediate their diversity and stability. However, as yet, the influence of migrants and their services on these communities is often overlooked, and as a consequence of global changes, migrations are threatened worldwide. Advances: We review several examples in which interactions between migratory animals and resident communities have been quantified, illustrating the processes by which migrants may uniquely alter energy flow, food-web topology and stability, trophic cascades, and the structure and dynamics of (meta-)communities. For example, the inputs of nutrients and energy originating from distant localities by migrants can dramatically increase resource availability, with rippling consequences for productivity at various trophic levels and the potential to drive the transition between alternative stable states. Migrant-mediated transport of propagules of other organisms can lead to the establishment of new or lost species, as well as influencing gene flow and genetic mixing among resident populations. Similarly, migrants can alter parasite transmission, diversity, and evolution by harboring a broader range of parasites than residents and by either facilitating or hindering the long-distance dispersal of parasites. Foraging by migrants can also have profound effects on community processes and ecosystem functions. For instance, grazing by migratory animals can alter nutrient cycling, primary productivity, biomass of edible plants, competitive interactions between plant species, and ultimately, the composition and long-term persistence of the entire plant community. The most striking difference between migrant and resident consumers is, however, the pulsed nature of migrant utilization and the timing of their interactions. Together, these fundamentally define the relationship between migrant abundance and primary production (in the case of migrant herbivores) or the stability of food webs (in the case of migratory predators). Outlook: Our Review demonstrates that the highly predictable, seasonally pulsed nature of animal migration, together with the spatial scales at which it operates and the immense number of individuals involved, not only set migration apart from other types of movement, but render it a uniquely potent, yet underappreciated, dimension of biodiversity that is intimately embedded within resident communities. Given the potential for migration to influence ecological networks worldwide, we suggest integrative network approaches, through which studies of community dynamics and ecosystem functioning may explicitly consider animal migrations, understand the ramifications of their declines, and assist in developing effective conservation measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Globally networked risks and how to respond
Helbing, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12047 · Cited by 1,281
Valente, T. W. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1217330 · Cited by 1,271
The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs.
McCann, K. S., Rasmussen, J. B., & Umbanhowar, J. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00742.x · Cited by 648
Temporal dynamics and network analysis
Blonder, B., Wey, T. W., Dornhaus, A., James, R., & Sih, A. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00236.x · Cited by 254
A landscape theory for food web architecture.
Rooney, N., McCann, K. S., & Moore, J. C. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01193.x · Cited by 245
Population regulation of Serengeti Wildebeeest: a test of the food hypothesis
Sinclair, A. R. E., Dublin, H., & Borner, M. (1985) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00379227 · Cited by 160
Food-web structure and ecosystem services: insights from the Serengeti
Dobson, A. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0287 · Cited by 81
Cited by
The multilayer nature of ecological networks
Pilosof, S., Porter, M. A., Pascual, M., & Kéfi, S. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0101 · Cited by 574
Animals and the zoogeochemistry of the carbon cycle
Schmitz, O. J., Wilmers, C. C., Leroux, S. J., Doughty, C. E., Atwood, T. B., Galetti, M., Davies, A. B., & Goetz, S. J. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3213 · Cited by 372
Life‐history strategies in salmonids: the role of physiology and its consequences
Birnie‐Gauvin, K., Bordeleau, X., Cooke, S. J., Davidsen, J. G., Eldøy, S. H., Eliason, E. J., Moore, A., & Aarestrup, K. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12753 · Cited by 68
Genetics and Evolution of Bird Migration
Gu, Z., Dixon, A., & Zhan, X. (2024) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-021122-092239 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, S., & Hoye, B. J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2014-04-04
- Volume
- 344
- Issue
- 6179
- Pages
- 1242552-1242552
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1990273831
- Cited by
- 899
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 48.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Migratory Animals Couple Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning Worldwide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1242552
- The paper
- Bauer, S., & Hoye, B. J. (2014). Migratory Animals Couple Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning Worldwide. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.