Cited by 1,075Microfinance and Financial InclusionPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareInnovation and Socioeconomic Development

A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries

Open access
Banerjee, Abhijit, Duflo, Esther, Goldberg, Nathanael, Karlan, Dean, Osei, Robert, Parienté, William, Shapiro, Jeremy, Thuysbaert, Bram +1 more·2015·Science

Abstract

Attacking the problem of extreme poverty: A persistent concern about wellintentioned efforts to improve living standards for the 1.2 billion people who survive (if it can be called that) on less than $1.25 US per day is figuring out what works. A second concern is figuring out whether what works in one setting can be made to work in another. Banerjee et al. describe encouraging results from a set of pilot projects in Ethiopia, Ghana, Honduras, India, Pakistan, and Peru encompassing 11,000 households. Each project provided short-term aid and longer-term support to help participants graduate to a sustainable level of existence. Science , this issue 10.1126/science.1260799

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1260799

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Goldberg, N., Karlan, D., Osei, R., Parienté, W., Shapiro, J., Thuysbaert, B., & Udry, C.
Affiliations
  • Center for Economic and Policy Research (US)
  • Innovations for Poverty Action (US)
  • University of Ghana (GH)
  • Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Karlan, Dean
Venue
Science
Published
2015-05-15
Volume
348
Issue
6236
Pages
1260799-1260799
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2152792807
Cited by
1,075
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
231.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ford Foundation
  • U.S. Agency for International Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Keywords
very poor households, self-employment training, health education, psychosocial well-being, cost-effectiveness, program sustainability, livelihoods, randomized controlled trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review