Cited by 512Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation Theories

The nongravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters

Open access
Harvey, David, Massey, Richard, Kitching, Thomas, Taylor, Andy, Tittley, Eric·2015·Science

Abstract

Uncloaking the influence of the invisible actor: The idea of dark matter enjoys popular support, but two major concerns persist: the so-called Standard Model excludes it, and it cannot be directly detected by any telescope. For now, astronomers can only observe dark matter's influence indirectly, such as when watching unseen creatures perturb the surface of a pond. Harvey et al. observed 72 galaxy collisions to compare the resulting centers of mass for the gas and stars (from direct observations) and for the dark matter (by inference). Based on these offsets, dark matter is clearly present. Science , this issue p. 1462

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1261381

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant self-interaction cross section would induce a momentum-transfer drag, resulting in an offset between the dark matter mass centroid and the galaxies.

    “Conversely, a significant SICS would induce a momentumtransfer drag, resulting in an offset between the DM mass centroid and the galaxies (M.Markevitch et al. 2004;D. Harvey et al. 2015).”

    From A New Robust Constraint on the Self-interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter with Double Radio Relic Clusters (2026) · cites this paper as D. Harvey et al. 2015

    The main text says that an additional drag force would produce a lag of dark matter behind the stars. But the paper limits this drag-and-offset mechanism to frequent, low-momentum, long-range self-interactions; it says rare, high-momentum, short-range interactions tend instead to scatter dark matter away and cause mass loss. The cited claim omits that distinction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Harvey et al. (2015) derived an upper limit on the self-interaction cross section of dark matter of <0.47 cm^2 g^-1 at 95% confidence and <-0.01 cm^2 g^-1 at 68% confidence by averaging DM-galaxy offsets in an ensemble of 30 merging galaxy clusters, using a simple solid-body scattering model.

    “In an influential recent paper, Harvey et al. derive an upper limit to the self-interaction cross section of dark matter (DM) ( m DM s <0.47 cm 2 g -1 at 95% confidence) by averaging the DM-galaxy offsets in a sample of merging galaxy clusters.”

    From The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters (2018) · cites this paper as Harvey et al. (2015)

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [8]8. D. N. Spergel, P. J. Steinhardt, Observational Evidence for Self-Interacting Cold Dark Matter, Physical Review Letters 84 , 3760-3763 (2000).
  2. [12]12. R. Foot, Mirror dark matter: Cosmology, galaxy structure and direct detection, International Journal of Modern Physics A 29 , 30013 (2014).
  3. [14]14. Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky, J. G. Wacker, The SIMP Miracle, arXiv:1402.5143 (2014). · arXiv
  4. [16]16. S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, K. M. Zurek, Resonant Dark Forces and Small-Scale Structure, Physical Review Letters 110 , 111301 (2013).
  5. [40]40. A. M. Koekemoer, A. S. Fruchter, R. N. Hook, W. Hack, HST Calibration Workshop : Hubble after the Installation of the ACS and the NICMOS Cooling System , S. Arribas, A. Koekemoer, B. Whitmore, eds. (2003), p. 337.
  6. [46]46. J. E. Krist, R. N. Hook, F. Stoehr (2011), vol. 8127 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series .
  7. [47]47. E. Jullo, et al. , A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters, New Journal of Physics 9 , 447 (2007).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey, D., Massey, R., Kitching, T., Taylor, A., & Tittley, E.
Affiliations
  • Royal Observatory (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Science
Published
2015-03-27
Volume
347
Issue
6229
Pages
1462-1465
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2078533011
Cited by
512
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 43
FWCI
39.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
  • Royal Society
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
dark matter self-interaction, galaxy cluster collisions, Bullet Cluster, non-gravitational forces, dark matter mass, dark matter substructure, Chandra X-ray observations, Hubble Space Telescope observations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review