Sonar System of the Blind New research measures their accuracy in detecting the texture, size, and distance of objects” by ear
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kellogg (1962) found blind participants could use echolocation to detect size differences.
“In a pioneering study, Kellogg (1962) found that blind particpants could use echolocation to detect size differences (see also Ammons, Worchel & Dallenbach, 1953).”
From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Kellogg (1962)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Kellogg, W. N.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kellogg, Winthrop N.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1962-08-10
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 3528
- Pages
- 399-404
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1992033104
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Keywords
- echolocation, sonar, animal hearing, auditory perception
- MeSH terms
- Blindness, Hearing, Humans, Sound, Persons with Visual Disabilities, Visually Impaired Persons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
