The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atomic Structure of the DNA Repair [4Fe-4S] Enzyme Endonuclease III
Abstract
The crystal structure of the DNA repair enzyme endonuclease III, which recognizes and cleaves DNA at damaged bases, has been solved to 2.0 angstrom resolution with an R factor of 0.185. This iron-sulfur [4Fe-4S] enzyme is elongated and bilobal with a deep cleft separating two similarly sized domains: a novel, sequence-continuous, six-helix domain (residues 22 to 132) and a Greek-key, four-helix domain formed by the amino-terminal and three carboxyl-terminal helices (residues 1 to 21 and 133 to 211) together with the [4Fe-4S] cluster. The cluster is bound entirely within the carboxyl-terminal loop with a ligation pattern (Cys-X 6 -Cys-X 2 -Cys-X 5 -Cys) distinct from all other known [4Fe-4S] proteins. Sequence conservation and the positive electrostatic potential of conserved regions identify a surface suitable for binding duplex B-DNA across the long axis of the enzyme, matching a 46 angstrom length of protected DNA. The primary role of the [4Fe-4S] cluster appears to involve positioning conserved basic residues for interaction with the DNA phosphate backbone. The crystallographically identified inhibitor binding region, which recognizes the damaged base thymine glycol, is a seven-residue β-hairpin (residues 113 to 119). Location and side chain orientation at the base of the inhibitor binding site implicate Glu 112 in the N -glycosylase mechanism and Lys 120 in the β-elimination mechanism. Overall, the structure reveals an unusual fold and a new biological function for [4Fe-4S] clusters and provides a structural basis for studying recognition of damaged DNA and the N -glycosylase and apurinic/apyrimidinic-lyase mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harman, D. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.11.7124 · Cited by 1,915
Cited by
Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA
Lindahl, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362709a0 · Cited by 5,679
UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review
Sinha, R. P., & Häder, D.-P. (2002) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/b201230h · Cited by 1,978
Structure, function, and formation of biological iron-sulfur clusters
Johnson, D. C., Dean, D. R., Smith, A. D., & Johnson, M. K. (2005) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133518 · Cited by 1,438
Structural basis for recognition and repair of the endogenous mutagen 8-oxoguanine in DNA
Bruner, S. D., Norman, D. P. G., & Verdine, G. L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002510 · Cited by 972
The base excision repair pathway
Seeberg, E., Eide, L., & Bjørås, M. (1995) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89086-6 · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuo, C.-F., McRee, D. E., Fisher, C. L., O'Handley, S. F., Cunningham, R. P., & Tainer, J. A.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1992-10-16
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 5081
- Pages
- 434-440
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1966631359
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atomic Structure of the DNA Repair [4Fe-4S] Enzyme Endonuclease III. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1411536
- The paper
- Kuo, C.-F., McRee, D. E., Fisher, C. L., O'Handley, S. F., Cunningham, R. P., & Tainer, J. A. (1992). Atomic Structure of the DNA Repair [4Fe-4S] Enzyme Endonuclease III. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1411536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.