Residual Vision in a Scotoma: Implications for Blindsight
Abstract
Blindsight, the ability of some blind patients to describe attributes of stimuli they have no conscious awareness of seeing, has been attributed to a secondary (retinotectal) visual pathway. However, it has also been proposed that blindsight could be due to residual function within the primary (geniculostriate) visual pathway. Data have now been obtained that support the second alternative. With an image stabilizer ensuring the accurate retinal placement of stimuli, dense visual field mapping was carried out with a hemianopic patient. This perimetry revealed, embedded in the patient's scotoma, an isolated 1-degree island of residual vision that was not disclosed by conventional perimetric methods. Stimuli presented to this island could be detected and discriminated, although the subject reported he did not see them. The existence of this island of vision implies a corresponding island of functioning cortex within the patient's lesion. Other instances of blindsight may be mediated by similar islands of functioning cortex.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An image stabilizer coupled to a Purkinje image eyetracker with 1 arcmin of resolution ensured the proper lateralization of stimuli.
“For all experiments but the tactile naming test, an image stabilizer coupled to a Purkinje image eyetracker with 1 arcmin of resolution ensured the proper lateralization of stimuli {see Fendrich et al., 1992).”
From Collaboration between the hemispheres of a callosotomy patient: Emerging right hemisphere speech and the left hemisphere interpreter (1996) · cites this paper as Fendrich et al., 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Attention without awareness in blindsight
Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Weiskrantz, L. (1999) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0850 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Gazzaniga, M. S., Eliassen, J. C., Nisenson, L., Wessinger, C. M., Fendrich, R., & Baynes, K. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.4.1255 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Fendrich, R., Wessinger, C. M., & Gazzaniga, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1992-11-27
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 5087
- Pages
- 1489-1491
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2047601913
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01 NS1778-10)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
- Keywords
- blindsight, scotoma, residual vision, hemianopia, visual field mapping, visual field testing, retinotectal pathway, geniculostriate pathway, visual cortex, blind patients
- MeSH terms
- Eye Movements, Hemianopsia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Scotoma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields, Visual Pathways, Visual Field Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review