The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities: Numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution.
Abstract
Most plant communities consist of several or many species which compete for light, water, and nutrients. Species in a given community may be ranked by their relative success in competition; productivity seems to be the best measure of their success or importance in the community. Curves of decreasing productivity connect the few most important species (the dominants) with a larger number of species of intermediate importance (whose number primarily determines the community's diversity or richness in species) and a smaller number of rare species. These curves are of varied forms and are believed to express different patterns of competition and niche differentiation in communities. It is probably true of plants, as of animals, that no two species in a stable community occupy the same niche. Evolution of niche differentiation makes possible the occurrence together of many plant species which are partial, rather than direct, competitors. Species tend to evolve also toward habitat differentiation, toward scattering of their centers of maximum population density in relation to environmental gradients, so that few species are competing with one another in their population centers. Evolution of both niche and habitat differentiation permits many species to exist together in communities as partial competitors, with distributions broadly and continuously overlapping, forming the landscape's many intergrading communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Cited by
Schoener, T. W. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4145.27 · Cited by 4,129
Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects
Grime, J. P. (1998) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x · Cited by 3,019
Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss
Smith, M. D., & Knapp, A. K. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00454.x · Cited by 824
Smith, M. D., Knapp, A. K., & Collins, S. L. (2009) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-1815.1 · Cited by 602
Garnier, E., & Navas, M.-L. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0036-y · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Whittaker, R. H.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1965-01-15
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 3655
- Pages
- 250-260
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2035166278
- Cited by
- 1,628
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities: Numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.147.3655.250
- The paper
- Whittaker, R. H. (1965). Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities: Numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.147.3655.250
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.