The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora
ter Steege, H., Pitman, N. C. A., Sabatier, D., Baraloto, C., Salomão, R. P., Guevara, J. E., Phillips, O. L., Castilho, C. V., Magnusson, W. E., Molino, J.-F., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1243092 · Cited by 1,471
Delimiting Species without Monophyletic Gene Trees
Knowles, L. L., & Carstens, B. C. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701701091 · Cited by 788
(2017) · Raptors · doi:10.7591/9781501707865-005 · Cited by 359
Global Conservation Significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park
Bass, M. S., Finer, M., Jenkins, C. N., Kreft, H., Cisneros-Heredia, D. F., McCracken, S. F., Pitman, N. C. A., English, P. H., Swing, K., Villa, G., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008767 · Cited by 346
Speciation in birds: Genes, geography, and sexual selection
Edwards, S. V., Kingan, S. B., Calkins, J. D., Balakrishnan, C. N., Jennings, W. B., Swanson, W. J., & Sorenson, M. D. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0501846102 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1902-01-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 369
- Pages
- 157-157
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2239083314
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.15.369.157
- The paper
- THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN. (1902). Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.15.369.157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
