Cited by 3,280Marine and coastal ecosystemsAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsMarine and fisheries research

Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton: The effect of a marine planktivore on lake plankton illustrates theory of size, competition, and predation.

Brooks, John Langdon, Dodson, Stanley I.·1965·Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.150.3692.28

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The absence of clear water phase maxima for the 2003-2005 interval, after 16 consecutive years of occurrence, reflects the loss of Daphnia associated with major increases in the alewife population.

    “The absence of the clear water phase maxima for the 2003-2005 interval, after 16 consecutive years of occurrence, reflects the loss of Daphnia associated with major increases in the alewife population ( Alosa pseudoharengus ; an obligate and efficient planktivore; Brooks and Dodson 1965).”
  • Phytoplankton biomass depends both on nutrient availability and grazing pressure from large-bodied zooplankton like Daphnia.

    “Phytoplankton biomass depends both on nutrient availability and grazing pressure from large bodied zooplankton like Daphnia (Brooks and Dodson 1965, Carpenter and Kitchell 1984, Lampert et al. 1986, McQueen et al. 1986).”
  • The continued low abundance of Daphnia through 2007 is characteristic of lakes with landlocked alewives because these fish select for large zooplankton.

    “The continued low abundance of Daphnia through 2007 is characteristic of lakes with landlocked alewives because these fish select for large zooplankton (Brooks and Dodson 1965, Meyer and Effler 1980, Post et al. 2008).”
  • The decline of large zooplankton potentially allows increased algal biomass and reduced water transparency, in accordance with trophic cascade theory and specifically documented in alewife populations.

    “The decline of large zooplankton potentially allows increased algal biomass (and reduced water transparency) in accordance with trophic cascade theory and specifically documented in alewife populations (Brooks and Dodson 1965, Carpenter et al. 1985, Harman et al. 2002).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, J. L., & Dodson, S. I.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1965-10
Volume
150
Issue
3692
Pages
28-35
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2028435430
Cited by
3,280
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 92
FWCI
14.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
plankton, predation, body size, body composition, zooplankton, predator-prey interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review