The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immunization of Normal Mouse Spleen Cell Suspensions in vitro
Abstract
Dissociated cells from the spleens of unimmunized mice were cultured with and without various mammalian erythrocytes. Spleen cell suspensions cultured with heterologous red cells developed levels of hemolytic plaque-forming cells only one log 2 less than those seen in vivo. The reaction is specific for the in vitro immunizing erythrocytes. Antibody was demonstrated in the culture fluids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beyond oxidative stress: an immunologist's guide to reactive oxygen species
Nathan, C., & Cunningham-Bussel, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3423 · Cited by 1,619
Cabeza-Cabrerizo, M., Cardoso, A., Minutti, C. M., Pereira da Costa, M., & Reis e Sousa, C. (2021) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-061020-053707 · Cited by 757
A Requirement for Two Cell Types for Antibody Formation in vitro
Mosier, D. E. (1967) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.158.3808.1573 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishell, R. I., & Dutton, R. W.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1966-08-26
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 3739
- Pages
- 1004-1006
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2037232132
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunization of Normal Mouse Spleen Cell Suspensions in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.153.3739.1004
- The paper
- Mishell, R. I., & Dutton, R. W. (1966). Immunization of Normal Mouse Spleen Cell Suspensions in vitro. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3739.1004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.