The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pulsating Radio Sources near the Crab Nebula
Abstract
Two new pulsating radio sources, designated NP 0527 and NP 0532, were found near the Crab Nebula and could be coincident with it. Both sources are sporadic, and no periodicities are evident. The pulse dispersions indicate that 1.58 ± 0.03 and 1.74 ± 0.02 × 10 20 electrons per square centimeter lie in the direction of NP 0527 and NP 0532, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observation of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source
HEWISH, A., BELL, S. J., PILKINGTON, J. D. H., SCOTT, P. F., & COLLINS, R. A. (1968) · Nature · doi:10.1038/217709a0 · Cited by 1,821
Cited by
The Crab Nebula: An Astrophysical Chimera
Hester, J. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110608 · Cited by 391
Binary pulsars and relativistic gravity
Taylor, J. H. (1994) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.66.711 · Cited by 324
Tu, L.-C., Luo, J., & Gillies, G. T. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/1/r02 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Staelin, D. H., & Reifenstein, E. C.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1968-12-27
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 3861
- Pages
- 1481-1483
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2055704529
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulsating Radio Sources near the Crab Nebula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.162.3861.1481
- The paper
- Staelin, D. H., & Reifenstein, E. C. (1968). Pulsating Radio Sources near the Crab Nebula. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3861.1481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
