Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 532

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time Differences in the Formation of Meteorites as Determined from the Ratio of Lead-207 to Lead-206

Tatsumoto, Mitsunobu, Knight, Roy J., Allegre, Claude J.·1973·Science

Abstract

Measurements of the lead isotopic composition and the uranium, thorium, and lead concentrations in meteorites were made in order to obtain more precise radiometric ages of these members of the solar system. The newly determined value of the lead isotopic composition of Canyon Diablo troilite is as follows: 206 Pb/ 204 Pb = 9.307, 207 Pb/ 204 Pb = 10.294, and 208 Pb/ 204 Pb = 29.476. The leads of Angra dos Reis, Sioux County, and Nuevo Laredo achondrites are very radiogenic, the 206 Pb/ 204 Pb values are about 200, and the uranium-thorium-lead systems are nearly concordant. The ages of the meteorites as calculated from a single-stage 207 Pb/ 206 Pb isochron based on the newly determined primordial lead value and the newly reported 235 U and 238 U decay constants, are 4.528 × 10 9 years for Sioux County and Nuevo Laredo and 4.555 × 10 9 years for Angra dos Reis. When calculated with the uranium decay constants used by Patterson, these ages are 4.593 × 10 9 years and 4.620 × 10 9 years, respectively, and are therefore 40 to 70 × 10 6 years older than the 4.55 × 10 9 years age Patterson reported. The age difference of 27 × 10 6 years between Angra dos Reis and the other two meteorites is compatible with the difference between the initial 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio of Angra dos Reis and that of seven basaltic achondrites observed by Papanastassiou and Wasserburg. The time difference is also comparable to that determined by 129 I- 129 Xe chronology. The ages of ordinary chondrites (H5 and L6) range from 4.52 to 4.57 × 10 9 years, and, here too, time differences in the formation of the parent bodies or later metamorphic events are indicated. Carbonaceous chondrites (C2 and C3) appear to contain younger lead components.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.180.4092.1279

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 532

Metadata

Authors
Tatsumoto, M., Knight, R. J., & Allegre, C. J.
Venue
Science
Published
1973-06-22
Volume
180
Issue
4092
Pages
1279-1283
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2073066596
Cited by
532
References
1
FWCI
21.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time Differences in the Formation of Meteorites as Determined from the Ratio of Lead-207 to Lead-206. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.180.4092.1279
The paper
Tatsumoto, M., Knight, R. J., & Allegre, C. J. (1973). Time Differences in the Formation of Meteorites as Determined from the Ratio of Lead-207 to Lead-206. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.180.4092.1279

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.