The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time Differences in the Formation of Meteorites as Determined from the Ratio of Lead-207 to Lead-206
Abstract
Measurements of the lead isotopic composition and the uranium, thorium, and lead concentrations in meteorites were made in order to obtain more precise radiometric ages of these members of the solar system. The newly determined value of the lead isotopic composition of Canyon Diablo troilite is as follows: 206 Pb/ 204 Pb = 9.307, 207 Pb/ 204 Pb = 10.294, and 208 Pb/ 204 Pb = 29.476. The leads of Angra dos Reis, Sioux County, and Nuevo Laredo achondrites are very radiogenic, the 206 Pb/ 204 Pb values are about 200, and the uranium-thorium-lead systems are nearly concordant. The ages of the meteorites as calculated from a single-stage 207 Pb/ 206 Pb isochron based on the newly determined primordial lead value and the newly reported 235 U and 238 U decay constants, are 4.528 × 10 9 years for Sioux County and Nuevo Laredo and 4.555 × 10 9 years for Angra dos Reis. When calculated with the uranium decay constants used by Patterson, these ages are 4.593 × 10 9 years and 4.620 × 10 9 years, respectively, and are therefore 40 to 70 × 10 6 years older than the 4.55 × 10 9 years age Patterson reported. The age difference of 27 × 10 6 years between Angra dos Reis and the other two meteorites is compatible with the difference between the initial 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio of Angra dos Reis and that of seven basaltic achondrites observed by Papanastassiou and Wasserburg. The time difference is also comparable to that determined by 129 I- 129 Xe chronology. The ages of ordinary chondrites (H5 and L6) range from 4.52 to 4.57 × 10 9 years, and, here too, time differences in the formation of the parent bodies or later metamorphic events are indicated. Carbonaceous chondrites (C2 and C3) appear to contain younger lead components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age of meteorites and the Earth
Patterson, C. (1956) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(56)90036-9 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Ore lead isotope ratios in a continuously changing earth
Cumming, G. L., & Richards, J. R. (1975) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(75)90223-x · Cited by 1,049
Solar models with helium and heavy-element diffusion
Bahcall, J. N., Pinsonneault, M. H., & Wasserburg, G. J. (1995) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.67.781 · Cited by 873
Progressive growth of the Earth's continental crust and depleted mantle: Geochemical constraints
McCulloch, M. T., & Bennett, V. C. (1994) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(94)90203-8 · Cited by 384
Geochemical constraints on core formation in the Earth
Jones, J. H., & Drake, M. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/322221a0 · Cited by 310
The Age of the Carbonates in Martian Meteorite ALH84001
Borg, L. E., Connelly, J. N., Nyquist, L. E., Shih, C.-Y., Wiesmann, H., & Reese, Y. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5437.90 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Tatsumoto, M., Knight, R. J., & Allegre, C. J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1973-06-22
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 4092
- Pages
- 1279-1283
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2073066596
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time Differences in the Formation of Meteorites as Determined from the Ratio of Lead-207 to Lead-206. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.180.4092.1279
- The paper
- Tatsumoto, M., Knight, R. J., & Allegre, C. J. (1973). Time Differences in the Formation of Meteorites as Determined from the Ratio of Lead-207 to Lead-206. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.180.4092.1279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.