Cited by 752Geological and Geochemical AnalysisAstro and Planetary ScienceGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr Chronology of Continental Crust Formation: Times of addition to continents of chemically fractionated mantle-derived materials are determined.

McCulloch, M. T., Wasserburg, G. J.·1978·Science

Abstract

Samarium-neodymium and rubidium-strontium isotopic systematics together with plausible assumptions regarding the geochemical evlution of continental crust material, have been used to ascertain the times at which segments of continental crust were formed. Analyses of composites from the Canadian Shield representing portions of the Superior, Slave, and Churchill structural provinces indicate that these provinces were all formed within the period 2.5 to 2.7 aeons. It has been possible to determine the mean age of sediment provenances, as studies of sedimentary rocks suggest that the samarium-neodymium isotopic system is not substantially disturbed during sedimentation or diagenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.200.4345.1003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Major fractionation of rare earth elements is accomplished during igneous differentiation of rocks from the mantle, resulting in lower parent-to-daughter ratios of crustal products for both the 147Sm/143Nd and 176Lu/177Hf systematics.

    “The major fractionation of REE is accomplished during igneous differentiation of rocks from the mantle, resulting in lower parent-to-daughter ratios of the crustal products for both the 147Sm/143Nd (McCulloch and Wasserburg, 1978) and the 176Lu/177Hf (White and Patchett, 1982) systematics.”

    From Evolution of Sedimentary Rocks (2014) · cites this paper as McCulloch and Wasserburg, 1978

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCulloch, M. T., & Wasserburg, G. J.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1978-06-02
Volume
200
Issue
4345
Pages
1003-1011
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2057091716
Cited by
752
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
continental crust formation, Sm-Nd isotopes, Rb-Sr isotopes, Canadian Shield, Superior Province, Slave Province, Churchill Province, sediment provenance, crustal evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review