The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mathematics and Science Learning: A New Conception
Abstract
Findings in cognitive science suggest new approaches to teaching in science and mathematics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning and Instruction: An Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education
Eylon, B.-S., & Linn, M. C. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170256 · Cited by 371
Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators
Mathewson, J. H. (1999) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199901)83:1<33::aid-sce2>3.0.co;2-z · Cited by 342
Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: Implications for educational practice
Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1991) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660280909 · Cited by 275
Learning Science and the Science of Learning
Novak, J. D. (1988) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057268808559949 · Cited by 249
Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2008.10782510 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Resnick, L. B.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1983-04-29
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 4596
- Pages
- 477-478
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1976542740
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 192.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mathematics and Science Learning: A New Conception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.220.4596.477
- The paper
- Resnick, L. B. (1983). Mathematics and Science Learning: A New Conception. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4596.477
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
