Cited by 168Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

The Early Radiation and Relationships of the Major Arthropod Groups

Briggs, Derek E. G., Fortey, Richard A.·1989·Science

Abstract

Cambrian arthropods are now well known, but there has been little agreement on how they contribute to an understanding of arthropod phylogeny. Fossils have either been lumped together as "trilobitomorphs" or, more recently, have been the subject of speculation invoking a multiple polyphyletic origin of arthropods. Cladistic analysis of characters of Cambrian and living representatives (excluding Uniramia) shows that trilobites and chelicerates are relatively advanced compared with "crustaceans," and there are doubts whether the latter constitute a national group. An undue emphasis on singular autapomorphies of problematic fossils has obscured these relationships in the past. "Trilobitomorphs" were simply an artificial taxon based on shared primitive characters. The arthropods that evolved during the Cambrian radiation show no more apparent morphological diversity than do the living groups. The evidence of wellpreserved problematica is critical to understanding the nature of this radiation and the affinities of the groups that remain today.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.246.4927.241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disparity among Cambrian arthropods is close to that of the Recent, and the morphospace occupied by Recent Arthropoda was already filled by Cambrian time.

    “Disparity among Cambrian arthropods is close to that of the Recent (taking a representative selection of morphologies from the Recent fauna for comparison), ot mpds mpnt t , t t t at occupied by Recent Arthropoda was already filled by Cambrian time.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 168

Authors
Briggs, D. E. G., & Fortey, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • British Museum (GB)
Venue
Science
Published
1989-10-13
Volume
246
Issue
4927
Pages
241-243
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2092216315
Cited by
168
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
18.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
Cambrian arthropods, arthropod phylogeny, Cambrian explosion, trilobites, chelicerates, Crustacea, polyphyly, autapomorphies, fossil morphology, cladistic analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review