Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fluorous Synthesis: A Fluorous-Phase Strategy for Improving Separation Efficiency in Organic Synthesis

Studer, Armido, Hadida, Sabine, Ferritto, Rafael, Kim, Sun-Young, Jeger, Patrick, Wipf, Peter, Curran, Dennis P.·1997·Science

Abstract

Recovery and purification difficulties can limit the yield and utility of otherwise successful organic synthesis strategies. A “fluorous synthesis” approach is outlined in which organic molecules are rendered soluble in fluorocarbon solvents by attachment of a suitable fluorocarbon group. Fluorocarbon solvents are usually immiscible in organic solutions, and fluorous molecules partition out of an organic phase and into a fluorous phase in a standard liquid-liquid extraction. Simple yet substantive separations of organic reaction mixtures are achieved without resorting to chromatography. Because fluorous synthesis combines in many respects the favorable purification features of solid-phase synthesis with the favorable reaction, identification, and analysis features of traditional organic synthesis, it should prove valuable in the automated synthesis of libraries of individual pure organic compounds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.275.5301.823

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. ibid., p. 1386;
  2. Boger D. L. , Tarby C. M. , Myers P. L. , Caporale L. H., ibid., p. 2109;
  3. Mitscher L. A., Chemtracts Org. Chem. 8, 19 (1995).
  4. Curran D. P., Chemtracts Org. Chem. 9, 75 (1996).
  5. Hildebrand J. H. and , Cochran D. F. R., ibid. 71, 22 (1949);
  6. Detailed experimental procedures are contained in the supplementary material at Science 's World Wide Web site (http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/275/5301/823#supplement).

Metadata

Authors
Studer, A., Hadida, S., Ferritto, R., Kim, S.-Y., Jeger, P., Wipf, P., & Curran, D. P.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Venue
Science
Published
1997-02-07
Volume
275
Issue
5301
Pages
823-826
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
470
References
29
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluorous Synthesis: A Fluorous-Phase Strategy for Improving Separation Efficiency in Organic Synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.275.5301.823
The paper
Studer, A., Hadida, S., Ferritto, R., Kim, S.-Y., Jeger, P., Wipf, P., & Curran, D. P. (1997). Fluorous Synthesis: A Fluorous-Phase Strategy for Improving Separation Efficiency in Organic Synthesis. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5301.823

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.