Cited by 127

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tandem Array of Human Visual Pigment Genes at Xq28

Vollrath, Douglas, Nathans, Jeremy, Davis, Ronald W.·1988·Science

Abstract

Unequal crossing-over within a head-to-tail tandem array of the homologous red and green visual pigment genes has been proposed to explain the observed variation in green-pigment gene number among individuals and the prevalence of red-green fusion genes among color-blind subjects. This model was tested by probing the structure of the red and green pigment loci with long-range physical mapping techniques. The loci were found to constitute a gene array with an approximately 39-kilobase repeat length. The position of the red pigment gene at the 5′ edge of the array explains its lack of variation in copy number. Restriction maps of the array in four individuals who differ in gene number are consistent with a head-to-tail configuration of the genes. These results provide physical evidence in support of the model and help to explain the high incidence of color blindness in the human population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.2837827

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OPN1LW and OPN1MW are arranged in a tandem array.

    “OPN1LW and OPN1MW are arranged in a tandem array”

    From The genetics of normal and defective color vision (2011) · cites this paper as Vollrath, Nathans & Davis, 1988

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bowmaker, J. K., Colour Vision: 57 (1983).
  2. 10.1126/science.3538420 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90158-9 · DOI
  4. GITSCHIER, J, DETECTION AND SEQUENCE OF MUTATIONS IN THE FACTOR-VIII GENE OF HEMOPHILIACS, NATURE 315: 427 (1985). · DOI
  5. LAURIE, D.A., FURTHER-STUDIES ON BIVALENT CHIASMA FREQUENCY IN HUMAN MALES WITH NORMAL KARYOTYPES, ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS 49: 189 (1985). · DOI
  6. LAURIE, D.A., FURTHER-STUDIES ON CHIASMA DISTRIBUTION AND INTERFERENCE IN THE HUMAN MALE, ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS 49: 203 (1985). · DOI
  7. McKusick, V. A., Mendelian Inheritance in Man: 1340 (1986).
  8. 10.1126/science.2937147 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.3485310 · DOI
  10. ROZEN, R, GENE DELETION AND RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISMS AT THE HUMAN ORNITHINE TRANSCARBAMYLASE LOCUS, NATURE 313: 815 (1985). · DOI
  11. TAUB, R.A., VARIABLE AMPLIFICATION OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN-GAMMA LIGHT-CHAIN GENES IN HUMAN-POPULATIONS, NATURE 304: 172 (1983). · DOI
  12. Thompson, J. S., Genetics in Medicine: 87 (1986).
  13. 10.1093/nar/15.19.7865 · DOI
  14. WHITE, P.C., CONGENITAL ADRENAL-HYPERPLASIA .1., NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 316: 1519 (1987). · DOI
  15. WHITE, P.C., CONGENITAL ADRENAL-HYPERPLASIA .2., NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 316: 1580 (1987). · DOI
  16. YANG, T.P., MOLECULAR EVIDENCE FOR NEW MUTATION AT THE HPRT LOCUS IN LESCH-NYHAN PATIENTS, NATURE 310: 412 (1984). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vollrath, D., Nathans, J., & Davis, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
  • Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Venue
Science
Published
1988-06-17
Volume
240
Issue
4859
Pages
1669-1672
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
127
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review