Cited by 834Memory and Neural MechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Building neural representations of habits.

Jog, Mandar S., Kubota, Yasuo, Connolly, Christopher I., Hillegaart, Viveka, Graybiel, Ann M.·1999·Science

Abstract

Memories for habits and skills ("implicit or procedural memory") and memories for facts ("explicit or episodic memory") are built up in different brain systems and are vulnerable to different neurodegenerative disorders in humans. So that the striatum-based mechanisms underlying habit formation could be studied, chronic recordings from ensembles of striatal neurons were made with multiple tetrodes as rats learned a T-maze procedural task. Large and widely distributed changes in the neuronal activity patterns occurred in the sensorimotor striatum during behavioral acquisition, culminating in task-related activity emphasizing the beginning and end of the automatized procedure. The new ensemble patterns remained stable during weeks of subsequent performance of the same task. These results suggest that the encoding of action in the sensorimotor striatum undergoes dynamic reorganization as habit learning proceeds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.286.5445.1745

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 834

Authors
Jog, M. S., Kubota, Y., Connolly, C. I., Hillegaart, V., & Graybiel, A. M.
Affiliations
  • London Health Sciences Centre (CA)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • SRI International (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Jog, Mandar S.
  • Kubota, Yasuo
  • Graybiel, Ann M.
Venue
Science
Published
1999-11-26
Volume
286
Issue
5445
Pages
1745-1749
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2015609730
Cited by
834
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r03mh057878-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R03 MH57878)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
habit learning, procedural memory, sensorimotor striatum, tetrode recordings, T-maze task, memory encoding
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Electrodes, Implanted, Evoked Potentials, Habits, Locomotion, Memory, Motor Activity, Neurons, Reaction Time, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review