The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complementary Neural Mechanisms for Tracking Items in Human Working Memory
Abstract
Recognition of a specific visual target among equally familiar distracters requires neural mechanisms for tracking items in working memory. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed evidence for two such mechanisms: (i) Enhanced neural responses, primarily in the frontal cortex, were associated with the target and were maintained across repetitions of the target. (ii) Reduced responses, primarily in the extrastriate visual cortex, were associated with stimulus repetition, regardless of whether the stimulus was a target or a distracter. These complementary neural mechanisms track the status of familiar items in working memory, allowing for the efficient recognition of a currently relevant object and rejection of irrelevant distracters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
The Predictive Value of Changes in Effective Connectivity for Human Learning
Büchel, C., Coull, J. T., & Friston, K. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5407.1538 · Cited by 447
Cited by
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
Self-citationNeuroimaging studies of working memory:
Wager, T. D., & Smith, E. E. (2003) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.3.4.255 · Cited by 1,889
Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not
Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.004 · Cited by 678
Brain systems mediating cognitive interference by emotional distraction
Dolcos, F., & McCarthy, G. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5042-05.2006 · Cited by 663
The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans
Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Hendler, T., & Malach, R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77754 · Cited by 578
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Y., Haxby, J. V., Martin, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Parasuraman, R.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2000-01-28
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 5453
- Pages
- 643-646
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2089177058
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complementary Neural Mechanisms for Tracking Items in Human Working Memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.287.5453.643
- The paper
- Jiang, Y., Haxby, J. V., Martin, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Parasuraman, R. (2000). Complementary Neural Mechanisms for Tracking Items in Human Working Memory. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5453.643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
