The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Managing Forests After Kyoto
Abstract
The Kyoto protocol aims to reduce carbon emissions into the atmosphere. Part of the strategy is the active management of terrestrial carbon sinks, principally through afforestation and reforestation. In their Perspective, Schulze et al. argue that the preservation of old-growth forests may have a larger positive effect on the carbon cycle than promotion of regrowth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?
Jandl, R., Lindner, M., Vesterdal, L., Bauwens, B., Baritz, R., Hagedorn, F., Johnson, D. W., Minkkinen, K., & Byrne, K. A. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003 · Cited by 1,458
Baldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Körner, C. (2003) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00742.x · Cited by 1,082
Thornton, P. E., Law, B. E., Gholz, H. L., Clark, K. L., Falge, E., Ellsworth, D. S., Goldstein, A. H., Monson, R. K., Hollinger, D., Falk, M., et al. (2002) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(02)00108-9 · Cited by 893
Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests
Keith, H., Mackey, B. G., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901970106 · Cited by 889
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulze, E.-D., Wirth, C., & Heimann, M.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2000-09-22
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 5487
- Pages
- 2058-2059
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1681877571
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing Forests After Kyoto. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.289.5487.2058
- The paper
- Schulze, E.-D., Wirth, C., & Heimann, M. (2000). Managing Forests After Kyoto. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5487.2058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
