Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,174

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Kingdom-Level Phylogeny of Eukaryotes Based on Combined Protein Data

Baldauf, Sandra L., Roger, A. J., Wenk-Siefert, I., Doolittle, W. F.·2000·Science

Abstract

Current understanding of the higher order systematics of eukaryotes relies largely on analyses of the small ribosomal subunit RNA (SSU rRNA). Independent testing of these results is still limited. We have combined the sequences of four of the most broadly taxonomically sampled proteins available to create a roughly parallel data set to that of SSU rRNA. The resulting phylogenetic tree shows a number of striking differences from SSU rRNA phylogeny, including strong support for most major groups and several major supergroups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.290.5493.972

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,174

Metadata

Authors
Baldauf, S. L., Roger, A. J., Wenk-Siefert, I., & Doolittle, W. F.
Venue
Science
Published
2000-11-03
Volume
290
Issue
5493
Pages
972-977
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2040438092
Cited by
1,174
References
0
FWCI
26.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Kingdom-Level Phylogeny of Eukaryotes Based on Combined Protein Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.290.5493.972
The paper
Baldauf, S. L., Roger, A. J., Wenk-Siefert, I., & Doolittle, W. F. (2000). A Kingdom-Level Phylogeny of Eukaryotes Based on Combined Protein Data. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5493.972

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.