Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,038

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Origins of Genomic Duplications in Arabidopsis

Vision, Todd J., Brown, Daniel G., Tanksley, Steven D.·2000·Science

Abstract

Large segmental duplications cover much of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Little is known about their origins. We show that they are primarily due to at least four different large-scale duplication events that occurred 100 to 200 million years ago, a formative period in the diversification of the angiosperms. A better understanding of the complex structural history of angiosperm genomes is necessary to make full use of Arabidopsis as a genetic model for other plant species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.290.5499.2114

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,038

Metadata

Authors
Vision, T. J., Brown, D. G., & Tanksley, S. D.
Venue
Science
Published
2000-12-15
Volume
290
Issue
5499
Pages
2114-2117
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2081840182
Cited by
1,038
References
1
FWCI
101.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Origins of Genomic Duplications in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.290.5499.2114
The paper
Vision, T. J., Brown, D. G., & Tanksley, S. D. (2000). The Origins of Genomic Duplications in Arabidopsis. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5499.2114

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.