Communicating Statistical Information
Open accessAbstract
Most people, experts included, have difficulties understanding and combining statistical information effectively. Hoffrage et al. demonstrate that these difficulties can be considerably reduced by communicating the information in terms of natural frequencies rather than in terms of probabilities. Several applications in medicine, legal decision-making, and education are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is ample room for improvement regarding the understanding of abstract statistical concepts by medical students and medical professionals.
“Several studies suggest that there is ample room for improvement regarding the understanding of abstract statistical concepts by medical students and medical professionals (Hoffrage et al., 2000; Rutledge et al., 2004).”
From Visualizing Uncertainty to Promote Clinicians’ Understanding of Measurement Error (2023) · cites this paper as Hoffrage et al., 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics
Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2007) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of Public Trust During Pandemics: Implications for Crisis Communication
Siegrist, M., & Zingg, A. (2014) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000169 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Heuristic decision making in medicine
Marewski, J. N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2012.14.1/jmarewski · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Self-citationHow behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Lewandowsky, S., Sunstein, C. R., & Hertwig, R. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0889-7 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationSánchez-Sánchez, J. L., Lu, W.-H., Gallardo-Gómez, D., del Pozo Cruz, B., de Souto Barreto, P., Lucia, A., & Valenzuela, P. L. (2024) · The Lancet Healthy Longevity · doi:10.1016/s2666-7568(24)00092-8 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
What makes a good clinical app? Introducing the RCP Health Informatics Unit checklist
Wyatt, J. C., Thimbleby, H., Rastall, P., Hoogewerf, J., Wooldridge, D., & Williams, J. (2015) · Clinical Medicine · doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.15-6-519 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Schulze, C., & Hertwig, R. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104580 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationCognitive prostheses for goal achievement
Lieder, F., Chen, O. X., Krueger, P. M., & Griffiths, T. L. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0672-9 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Visualizing Uncertainty to Promote Clinicians’ Understanding of Measurement Error
Frans, N., Hummelen, B., Albers, C. J., & Paap, M. C. S. (2023) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911221147042 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Several studies suggest that there is ample room for improvement regarding the understanding of abstract statistical concepts by medical students and medical professionals (Hoffrage et al., 2000; Rutledge et al., 2004).”
Background
- Authors
- Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hoffrage, Ulrich
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2000-12-22
- Volume
- 290
- Issue
- 5500
- Pages
- 2261-2262
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1815763400
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Keywords
- natural frequencies, probability understanding, statistical reasoning, conditional probability, clinical decision-making, legal decision-making
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, DNA Fingerprinting, Risk Assessment, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
