Cited by 670Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

Natal homing in a marine fish metapopulation

Thorrold, Simon R., Latkoczy, Christopher, Swart, Peter K., Jones, Cynthia M.·2001·Science

Abstract

Identifying natal origins of marine fishes is challenging because of difficulties in conducting mark-recapture studies in marine systems. We used natural geochemical signatures in otoliths (ear bones) to determine natal sources in weakfish (Cynoscion regalis), an estuarine-spawning marine fish, in eastern North America. Spawning site fidelity ranged from 60 to 81%, comparable to estimates of natal homing in birds and anadromous fishes. These data were in contrast to genetic analyses of population structure in weakfish. Our findings highlight the need for consideration of spatial processes in fisheries models and have implications for the design of marine reserves in coastal regions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.291.5502.297

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fish can navigate thousands of kilometres to reach the exact same site in which they were born (natal homing) or had previously spawned (repeated homing).

    “Fish can navigate thousands of kilometres to reach the exact same site in which they were born (natal homing, Cury, 1994;Thorrold et al., 2001) or had previously spawned (repeated homing, Corten, 2002;Skjæraasen et al., 2011).”

    From Evolutionary and ecological constraints of fish spawning habitats (2015) · cites this paper as Thorrold et al., 2001

  • Fish spawning in specific locales have been observed to repeat spawning there.

    “Fish spawning in specific locales have been observed to repeat spawning there.”

    From Evolutionary and ecological constraints of fish spawning habitats (2015) · cites this paper as Thorrold et al., 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thorrold, S. R., Latkoczy, C., Swart, P. K., & Jones, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biological Sciences,
  • Old Dominion University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Thorrold, Simon R.
Venue
Science
Published
2001-01-12
Volume
291
Issue
5502
Pages
297-299
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2156697710
Cited by
670
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 34
FWCI
22.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
natal homing, weakfish, Cynoscion regalis, otolith microchemistry, spawning site fidelity, metapopulation, population structure, marine reserve design, natal origin
MeSH terms
Animals, Elements, Female, Homing Behavior, Isotopes, Otolithic Membrane, Perciformes, Population Dynamics, Probability, Reproduction, Seawater, United States, Discriminant Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review