The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic Basis for Species Vulnerability in the Cheetah
Abstract
A population genetic survey of over 200 structural loci previously revealed that the South African cheetah ( Acinonyx jubatus jubatus ) has an extreme paucity of genetic variability, probably as a consequence of a severe population bottleneck in its recent past. The genetic monomorphism of the species is here extended to the major histocompatibility complex, since 14 reciprocal skin grafts between unrelated cheetahs were accepted. The apparent consequences of such genetic uniformity to the species include (i) great difficulty in captive breeding, (ii) a high degree of juvenile mortality in captivity and in the wild, and (iii) a high frequency of spermatozoal abnormalities in ejaculates. The species vulnerability of the cheetah was demonstrated by an epizootic of coronavirus-associated feline infectious peritonitis in an Oregon breeding colony in 1983. Exposure and spread of the coronavirus, which has a very low morbidity in domestic cats (approximately 1 percent), has decimated a heretofore productive and healthy captive population. The extreme genetic monomorphism, especially at the major histocompatibility complex, and the apparent hypersensitivity of the cheetah to a viral pathogen may be related, and provide a biological basis for understanding the adaptive significance of abundant genetic variation in outbred mammalian species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Directions in Conservation Biology
Caughley, G. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5542 · Cited by 2,405
HOW CLOSELY CORRELATED ARE MOLECULAR AND QUANTITATIVE MEASURES OF GENETIC VARIATION? A META-ANALYSIS
Reed, D. H., & Frankham, R. (2001) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00629.x · Cited by 803
Behavioral adaptations to pathogens and parasites: Five strategies
Hart, B. L. (1990) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80038-7 · Cited by 734
Mechanisms of disease‐induced extinction
De Castro, F., & Bolker, B. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00693.x · Cited by 676
RILEY, S. P. D., POLLINGER, J. P., SAUVAJOT, R. M., YORK, E. C., BROMLEY, C., FULLER, T. K., & WAYNE, R. K. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02907.x · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, S. J., Roelke, M. E., Marker, L., Newman, A., Winkler, C. A., Meltzer, D., Colly, L., Evermann, J. F., Bush, M., & Wildt, D. E.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1985-03-22
- Volume
- 227
- Issue
- 4693
- Pages
- 1428-1434
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1990719254
- Cited by
- 866
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Basis for Species Vulnerability in the Cheetah. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.2983425
- The paper
- O'Brien, S. J., Roelke, M. E., Marker, L., Newman, A., Winkler, C. A., Meltzer, D., Colly, L., Evermann, J. F., Bush, M., & Wildt, D. E. (1985). Genetic Basis for Species Vulnerability in the Cheetah. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2983425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.