NO Parkin in Parkinson's Disease
Abstract
In their report “S-nitrosylation of parkin regulates ubiquitination and compromises parkin's protective function” (28 May, p. 1328; Science Express 22 Apr.), K. K. K. Chung et al. raise the intriguing possibility that nitric oxide (NO) may contribute to the degenerative process in Parkinson's disease (PD). Unfortunately, the data shed no light on the central question, which is whether S-nitrosation of parkin attenuates its protective activity in vivo. That covalent modification of a cysteine residue(s) of a protein with unphysiological amounts of chemical reagent [0.1 mM S-nitroso-glutathione or NO donor] can decrease activity is not surprising and is biologically uninformative. A similarly unphysiological effect can occur when NO-synthase-containing cells are stimulated with ionophore in culture. The question is whether the amount of NO produced is similar to that produced in vivo. The identification of S-nitrosated parkin in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MTPT)-treated mice and human patients is suggestive, but some degree of modification would be expected in diseased tissue; the critical question is whether a high enough fraction of parkin is nitrosated to decrease its protective action. Unfortunately, no information is provided for this crucial point. It would be informative, for example, to test whether addition of ascorbate, which would presumably reduce nitrosothiol and regenerate thiol, increases parkin activity in samples from MTPT-treated mice and human tissue.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The uncharged and hydrophobic-soluble property of NO may allow it to signal many cell diameters distant from its site of generation.
“This property may allow free diffusion across biological membranes and the potential to signal many cell diameters distant from its site of generation (18, 19).”
From What Part of NO Don't You Understand? Some Answers to the Cardinal Questions in Nitric Oxide Biology (2010) · cites this paper as [18]
The uncharged and hydrophobic-soluble property of NO may allow free diffusion across biological membranes.
“This property may allow free diffusion across biological membranes and the potential to signal many cell diameters distant from its site of generation (18, 19).”
From What Part of NO Don't You Understand? Some Answers to the Cardinal Questions in Nitric Oxide Biology (2010) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Lancaster, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lancaster, Jack R.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2004-06-25
- Volume
- 304
- Issue
- 5679
- Pages
- 1905-1905
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2018382740
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, Parkin, S-nitrosylation, nitric oxide, ubiquitination, covalent protein modification, neuroprotection, MPTP, vitamin C
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Nitric Oxide, Parkinson Disease, Nitric Oxide Donors, MPTP Poisoning, S-Nitrosoglutathione, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review