Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,453

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Monoclonal Antibodies Defining Distinctive Human T Cell Surface Antigens

Kung, Patrick C., Goldstein, Gideon, Reinherz, Ellis L., Schlossman, Stuart F.·1979·Science

Abstract

Three novel monoclonal antibodies (designated OKT1, OKT3, and OKT4) were generated against surface determinants of human peripheral T cells. Both OKT1 and OKT3 reacted with all human peripheral T cells and 5 to 10 percent of thymocytes but differed in their reactivities with T cell lines. By contrast, OKT4 reacted with 55 percent of human peripheral T cells and 80 percent of thymocytes. All three antibodies were selective for T cells in the peripheral blood in that they did not react with normal B cells, null cells, monocytes, or granulocytes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.314668

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,453

Metadata

Authors
Kung, P. C., Goldstein, G., Reinherz, E. L., & Schlossman, S. F.
Venue
Science
Published
1979-10-19
Volume
206
Issue
4416
Pages
347-349
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2027922729
Cited by
1,453
References
0
FWCI
48.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monoclonal Antibodies Defining Distinctive Human T Cell Surface Antigens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.314668
The paper
Kung, P. C., Goldstein, G., Reinherz, E. L., & Schlossman, S. F. (1979). Monoclonal Antibodies Defining Distinctive Human T Cell Surface Antigens. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.314668

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.