Switch to Corn Promotes Amazon Deforestation
Abstract
The United States is the world's leading producer of soy. however, many u.s. farmers are shifting from soy to corn (maize) in order to qualify for generous government subsidies intended to promote biofuel production (1); since 2006, U.S. corn production has risen 19% while soy production has fallen by 15% (2). This in turn is helping to drive a major increase in global soy prices (3), which have nearly doubled in the past 14 months. The rising price for soy has important consequences for Amazonian forests and savanna-woodlands (4). In Brazil, the world's second-leading soy producer, deforestation rates (5) and especially fire incidence (6) have increased sharply in recent months in the main soy- and beef-producing states in Amazonia (and not in states with little soy production). Although dry weather is a contributing factor, these increases are widely attributed to rising soy and beef prices (5, 7), and studies suggest a strong link between Amazonian deforestation and soy demand.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence is mounting that biofuel production has contributed to recent deforestation.
“and evidence is mounting that biofuel production has contributed to recent deforestation”
From Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology (2008) · cites this paper as Laurance 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 5 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Laurance, W. F.
- Affiliations
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA)
- Corresponding author
- Laurance, William F.
- ORCID
- Laurance, William F.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2007-12-14
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 5857
- Pages
- 1721-1721
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2091913593
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 11.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- Amazon deforestation, biofuels, agricultural subsidies, maize production, soybean production, land use change, deforestation drivers
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Zea mays, Energy-Generating Resources, Glycine max, Trees, Crops, Agricultural
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review