Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tertiary Structure Is a Principal Determinant to Protein Deamidation

Kossiakoff, A. A.·1988·Science

Abstract

The protein deamidation process involves the conversion of the amide side-chain moieties of asparagine and glutamine residues to carboxyl groups. This conversion is an unusual form of protein modification in that it requires catalysis by an intramolecular reaction where both the substrate (asparagine and glutamine side chains) and "catalytic site" (the peptide nitrogen of the succeeding residue) are constituents of several consecutive residues along the polypeptide chain. The stereochemical factors governing this process were studied with a data base derived from the neutron crystallographic structure of trypsin from which amide groups and oxygen can be unambiguously differentiated because of their different neutron scattering properties. The neutron structure allowed for the direct determination of those residues that were deamidated; 3 of 13 asparagine residues were found to be modified. These modified residues were clearly distinguished by a distinct local conformation and hydrogen-bonding structure in contrast to those observed for the other asparagine residues. No correlation was found between preference to deamidate and the chemical character of residues flanking the site, as had been proposed from previous peptide studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.3353715

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deamidation of glutamine and asparagine is the most well studied modification, with glutamine deamidation more commonly applied as asparagine is subject to more influence from a protein's tertiary structure.

    “The most well studied of these modifications is deamidation (the removal of an amide group) of glutamine and asparagine (a process that transforms these amino acids into glutamic acid and aspartic acid, respectively), with glutamine deamidation more commonly applied as asparagine is subject to more influence from a protein’s tertiary structure (77).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [77]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. AHERN, T.J., CONTROL OF OLIGOMERIC ENZYME THERMOSTABILITY BY PROTEIN ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 84: 675 (1987).
  2. 10.1126/science.4001942 · DOI
  3. ASWAD, D.W., STOICHIOMETRIC METHYLATION OF PORCINE ADRENOCORTICOTROPIN BY PROTEIN CARBOXYL METHYLTRANSFERASE REQUIRES DEAMIDATION OF ASPARAGINE-25 - EVIDENCE FOR METHYLATION AT THE ALPHA-CARBOXYL GROUP OF ATYPICAL L-ISOASPARTYL RESIDUES, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 259: 10714 (1984). · DOI
  4. BORNSTEIN, P, METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY 47: 132 (1977). · DOI
  5. CLARKE, S, PROTEIN CARBOXYL METHYLTRANSFERASES - 2 DISTINCT CLASSES OF ENZYMES, ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY 54: 479 (1985). · DOI
  6. GEIGER, T, DEAMIDATION, ISOMERIZATION, AND RACEMIZATION AT ASPARAGINYL AND ASPARTYL RESIDUES IN PEPTIDES - SUCCINIMIDE-LINKED REACTIONS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO PROTEIN-DEGRADATION, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 262: 785 (1987). · DOI
  7. HARDING, J.J., NONENZYMATIC COVALENT POSTTRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATION OF PROTEINS INVIVO, ADVANCES IN PROTEIN CHEMISTRY 37: 247 (1985). · DOI
  8. JOHNSON, B.A., ENZYMATIC PROTEIN CARBOXYL METHYLATION AT PHYSIOLOGICAL PH - CYCLIC IMIDE FORMATION EXPLAINS RAPID METHYL TURNOVER, BIOCHEMISTRY 24: 2581 (1985). · DOI
  9. JOHNSON, B.A., PROTEIN CARBOXYL METHYLTRANSFERASE FACILITATES CONVERSION OF ATYPICAL L-ISOASPARTYL PEPTIDES TO NORMAL L-ASPARTYL PEPTIDES, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 262: 5622 (1987). · DOI
  10. KOSSIAKOFF, A.A., DIRECT DETERMINATION OF THE PROTONATION STATES OF ASPARTIC ACID-102 AND HISTIDINE-57 IN THE TETRAHEDRAL INTERMEDIATE OF THE SERINE PROTEASES - NEUTRON STRUCTURE OF TRYPSIN, BIOCHEMISTRY 20: 6462 (1981). · DOI
  11. MEINWALD, Y.C., DEAMIDATION OF THE ASPARAGINYL-GLYCYL SEQUENCE, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEPTIDE AND PROTEIN RESEARCH 28: 79 (1986). · DOI
  12. Murray, E. D., Journal of Biological Chemistry 259: 10722 (1984). · DOI
  13. RICHARDSON, J.S., ADVANCES IN PROTEIN CHEMISTRY 34: 167 (1981). · DOI
  14. ROBINSON, A.B., CURRENT TOPICS CELLU 8: 247 (1974). · DOI
  15. ROBINSON, A.B., RATES OF NONENZYMATIC DEAMIDATION OF GLUTAMINYL AND ASPARAGINYL RESIDUES IN PENTAPEPTIDES, JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 95: 8156 (1973). · DOI
  16. ROBINSON, A.B., CONTROLLED DEAMIDATION OF PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS - AN EXPERIMENTAL HAZARD AND A POSSIBLE BIOLOGICAL TIMER, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 66: 753 (1970).
  17. SHPUNGIN, J, A METHOD OF SOLVENT STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS FOR PROTEINS USING D2O-H2O NEUTRON DIFFERENCE MAPS, METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY 127: 329 (1986). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kossiakoff, A. A.
Affiliations
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Venue
Science
Published
1988-04-08
Volume
240
Issue
4849
Pages
191-194
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
186
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review