Cognitive Interaction After Staged Callosal Section: Evidence for Transfer of Semantic Activation
Abstract
Sensory and cognitive functions were assessed in a right-handed male before and after partial and complete callosal commissurotomy. After the initial posterior section was made, there was no evidence of interhemispheric sensory transfer, although the left hemisphere did have access to stimulus-related semantic and episodic information from the right hemisphere. After the callosum was completely sectioned, this exchange was no longer observed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 176
- Authors
- Sidtis, J. J., Volpe, B. T., Holtzman, J. D., Wilson, D. H., & Gazzaniga, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1981-04-17
- Volume
- 212
- Issue
- 4492
- Pages
- 344-346
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1978389782
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
- Keywords
- corpus callosum, interhemispheric transfer, semantic activation, episodic memory, interhemispheric interaction, hemispheric lateralization, cognitive interaction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Corpus Callosum, Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic, Humans, Language Disorders, Male, Methods, Perception, Perceptual Disorders, Postoperative Complications, Sensation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review