Cited by 94Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Enhancer Point Mutation Results in a Homeotic Transformation in Drosophila

Shimell, Mary Jane, Simon, Jeffrey, Bender, Welcome, O'Connor, Michael B.·1994·Science

Abstract

In Drosophila , the misexpression or altered activity of genes from the bithorax complex results in homeotic transformations. One of these genes, abd-A , normally specifies the identity of the second through fourth abdominal segments (A2 to A4). In the dominant Hyperabdominal mutations ( Hab ), portions of the third thoracic segment (T3) are transformed toward A2 as the result of ectopic abd-A expression. Sequence analysis and deoxyribonuclease I footprinting demonstrate that the misexpression of abd-A in two independent Hab mutations results from the same single base change in a binding site for the gap gene Krüppel protein. These results establish that the spatial limits of the homeotic genes are directly regulated by gap gene products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.7909957

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Drosophila, point mutations in the binding site for the Kruppel transcription factor within an enhancer controlling the abdominal fate specifier abd-A result in its misexpression in a thoracic segment, leading to its conversion to an abdominal one.

    “In Drosophila, for example, point mutations in the binding site for the Kruppel TF within an enhancer controlling the abdominal fate specifier abd-A results in its misexpression in a thoracic segment, leading to its conversion to an abdominal one [194].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shimell, M. J., Simon, J., Bender, W., & O'Connor, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and Developmental Biology Center, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717, USA.
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1994-05-13
Volume
264
Issue
5161
Pages
968-971
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1966375200
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
homeotic transformation, bithorax complex, abdominal-A, gap genes, segment identity, ectopic expression, Drosophila
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Homeobox, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, Proteins, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Repressor Proteins, Transcription Factors, Genes, Insect, Point Mutation, Drosophila Proteins, Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review