Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 871

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

"Infectious" Transplantation Tolerance

Qin, Shixin, Cobbold, Stephen P., Pope, Heather, Elliott, James, Kioussis, Dimitris, Davies, Joanna, Waldmann, Herman·1993·Science

Abstract

The maintenance of transplantation tolerance induced in adult mice after short-term treatment with nonlytic monoclonal antibodies to CD4 and CD8 was investigated. CD4 + T cells from tolerant mice disabled naïve lymphocytes so that they too could not reject the graft. The naive lymphocytes that had been so disabled also became tolerant and, in turn, developed the capacity to specifically disable other naive lymphocytes. This process of "infectious" tolerance explains why no further immunosuppression was needed to maintain long-term transplantation tolerance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.8094901

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 871

Metadata

Authors
Qin, S., Cobbold, S. P., Pope, H., Elliott, J., Kioussis, D., Davies, J., & Waldmann, H.
Venue
Science
Published
1993-02-12
Volume
259
Issue
5097
Pages
974-977
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2068238618
Cited by
871
References
0
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Infectious" Transplantation Tolerance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.8094901
The paper
Qin, S., Cobbold, S. P., Pope, H., Elliott, J., Kioussis, D., Davies, J., & Waldmann, H. (1993). "Infectious" Transplantation Tolerance. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8094901

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.