Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 856

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

De novo mutations in congenital heart disease with neurodevelopmental and other congenital anomalies

Open access
Homsy, Jason, Zaidi, Samir, Shen, Yufeng, Ware, James S., Samocha, Kaitlin E., Karczewski, Konrad J., DePalma, Steven R., McKean, David, Wakimoto, Hiroko, Gorham, Josh, Jin, Sheng Chih, Deanfield, John, Giardini, Alessandro, Porter, George A., Kim, Richard, Bilguvar, Kaya, López-Giráldez, Francesc, Tikhonova, Irina, Mane, Shrikant, Romano-Adesman, Angela, Qi, Hongjian, Vardarajan, Badri, Ma, Lijiang, Daly, Mark, Roberts, Amy E., Russell, Mark W., Mital, Seema, Newburger, Jane W., Gaynor, J. William, Breitbart, Roger E., Iossifov, Ivan, Ronemus, Michael, Sanders, Stephan J., Kaltman, Jonathan R., Seidman, Jonathan G., Brueckner, Martina, Gelb, Bruce D., Goldmuntz, Elizabeth, Lifton, Richard P., Seidman, Christine E., Chung, Wendy K.·2015·Science

Abstract

Putting both heart and brain at risk: For reasons that are unclear, newborns with congenital heart disease (CHD) have a high risk of neurodevelopmental disabilities. Homsy et al. performed exome sequence analysis of 1200 CHD patients and their parents to identify spontaneously arising (de novo) mutations. Patients with both CHD and neurodevelopmental disorders had a much higher burden of damaging de novo mutations, particularly in genes with likely roles in both heart and brain development. Thus, clinical genotyping of patients with CHD may help to identify those at greatest risk of neurodevelopmental disabilities, allowing surveillance and early intervention. Science , this issue p. 1262

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aac9396

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 856

Metadata

Authors
Homsy, J., Zaidi, S., Shen, Y., Ware, J. S., Samocha, K. E., Karczewski, K. J., DePalma, S. R., McKean, D., Wakimoto, H., Gorham, J., Jin, S. C., Deanfield, J., Giardini, A., Porter, G. A., Kim, R., Bilguvar, K., López-Giráldez, F., Tikhonova, I., Mane, S., Romano-Adesman, A., Qi, H., Vardarajan, B., Ma, L., Daly, M., Roberts, A. E., Russell, M. W., Mital, S., Newburger, J. W., Gaynor, J. W., Breitbart, R. E., Iossifov, I., Ronemus, M., Sanders, S. J., Kaltman, J. R., Seidman, J. G., Brueckner, M., Gelb, B. D., Goldmuntz, E., Lifton, R. P., Seidman, C. E., & Chung, W. K.
Venue
Science
Published
2015-12-04
Volume
350
Issue
6265
Pages
1262-1266
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2238514531
Cited by
856
References
11
FWCI
25.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: De novo mutations in congenital heart disease with neurodevelopmental and other congenital anomalies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aac9396
The paper
Homsy, J., Zaidi, S., Shen, Y., Ware, J. S., Samocha, K. E., Karczewski, K. J., DePalma, S. R., McKean, D., Wakimoto, H., Gorham, J., Jin, S. C., Deanfield, J., Giardini, A., Porter, G. A., Kim, R., Bilguvar, K., López-Giráldez, F., Tikhonova, I., Mane, S., . . . Chung, W. K. (2015). De novo mutations in congenital heart disease with neurodevelopmental and other congenital anomalies. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9396

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.