Cited by 230Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRIAction Observation and Synchronization

Ten-month-old infants infer the value of goals from the costs of actions

Open access
Liu, Shari, Ullman, Tomer D., Tenenbaum, Joshua B., Spelke, Elizabeth S.·2017·Science

Abstract

Ranking valuations on the basis of observed choices: Obliged to make a choice between two goals, we evaluate the benefits of achieving the goals compared with the costs of the actions required before deciding what to do. This seems perfectly straightforward, and it is unsurprising to learn that we can also apply this reasoning to others; that is, someone that we see choosing a goal that requires a more costly action must value that goal more highly. What is remarkable, as Liu et al. report, is that preverbal children can reason in this same fashion. Science , this issue p. 1038

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aag2132

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 230

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. D. C. Dennett, The Intentional Stance (The MIT Press, London, 1987).
  2. P. Muentener, S. Carey, Infants' causal representations of state change events. Cogn. Psychol. 61 (2010), pp. 63-86.
  3. A. E. Skerry, S. E. Carey, E. S. Spelke, First-person action experience reveals sensitivity to action efficiency in prereaching infants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 18728-33 (2013).
  4. C. M. Heyes, C. D. Frith, The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science. 344, 1243091 (2014).
  5. J. S. Mill, Utilitarianism (Oxford University, 1863).
  6. J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (Clarendon Press, 1879).
  7. C. G. Lucas et al., The child as econometrician: A rational model of preference understanding in children. PLoS One. 9 (2014), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092160. · DOI
  8. H. Wickham, ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2009).
  9. G. Gergely, H. Bekkering, I. Király, Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature. 415, 755 (2002).
  10. A. Jern, C. Kemp, in Proceedings of the 36th {A}nnual {C}onference of the {C}ognitive {S}cience {S}ociety, P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, B. Scassellati, Eds. (2014).
  11. S. Russell, P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Third edition (2014).

Authors
Liu, S., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Spelke, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Shari
Venue
Science
Published
2017-11-24
Volume
358
Issue
6366
Pages
1038-1041
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2770204006
Cited by
230
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13
FWCI
26.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Science Foundation (award311353, CCF-1231216, award311354, DGE-1144152)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
action costs, action planning, mental models, Bayesian inference, utility theory, effort, action understanding, social cognition development
MeSH terms
Child Development, Psychology, Child, Female, Goals, Humans, Infant, Male, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review