Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,344

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rechargeable nickel–3D zinc batteries: An energy-dense, safer alternative to lithium-ion

Parker, Joseph F., Chervin, Christopher N., Pala, Irina R., Machler, Meinrad, Burz, Michael F., Long, Jeffrey W., Rolison, Debra R.·2017·Science

Abstract

Zinc can compete with lithium: Although lithium-based batteries are ubiquitous, there are still challenges related to their longevity and safety, as well as concerns about material availability. Aqueous rechargeable batteries based on zinc might provide an alternative, but they have been plagued by the formation of dendrites during cycling. Parker et al.show that when zinc is formed into three-dimensional sponges, it can be used with nickel to form primary batteries that allow for deep discharge. Alternatively, the sponges can be used to produce secondary batteries that can be cycled thousands of times and can compete with lithium ion cells. Science, this issue p.415

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aak9991

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,344

Metadata

Authors
Parker, J. F., Chervin, C. N., Pala, I. R., Machler, M., Burz, M. F., Long, J. W., & Rolison, D. R.
Venue
Science
Published
2017-04-28
Volume
356
Issue
6336
Pages
415-418
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2609591181
Cited by
1,344
References
0
FWCI
46.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rechargeable nickel–3D zinc batteries: An energy-dense, safer alternative to lithium-ion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aak9991
The paper
Parker, J. F., Chervin, C. N., Pala, I. R., Machler, M., Burz, M. F., Long, J. W., & Rolison, D. R. (2017). Rechargeable nickel–3D zinc batteries: An energy-dense, safer alternative to lithium-ion. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aak9991

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.