The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 early science investigations of regional carbon dioxide fluxes
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Earth’s carbon cycle involves large fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO 2) between the atmosphere, land biosphere, and oceans. Over the past several decades, net loss of CO 2 from the atmosphere to the land and oceans has varied considerably from year to year, equaling 20 to 80% of CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and land use change. On average, the uptake is about 50%. The imbalance between CO 2 emissions and removal is seen in increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentrations. In recent years, an increase of 2 to 3 parts per million (ppm) per year in the atmospheric mole fraction, which is currently about 400 ppm, has been observed. Almost a quarter of the CO 2 emitted by human activities is being absorbed by the ocean, and another quarter is absorbed by processes on land. The identity and location of the terrestrial sinks are poorly understood. This absorption has been attributed by some to tropical or Eurasian temperate forests, whereas others argue that these regions may be net sources of CO 2. The efficiency of these land sinks appears to vary dramatically from year to year. Because the identity, location, and processes controlling these natural sinks are not well constrained, substantial additional uncertainty is added to projections of future CO 2 levels. RATIONALE: The NASA satellite, the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), which was launched on 2 July 2014, is designed to collect global measurements with sufficient precision, coverage, and resolution to aid in resolving sources and sinks of CO 2 on regional scales. Since 6 September 2014, the OCO-2 mission has been producing about 2 million estimates of the column-averaged CO 2 dry-air mole fraction (XCO2) each month after quality screening, with spatial resolution of <3 km 2 per sounding. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), a small amount of light emitted during photosynthesis, is detected in remote sensing measurements of radiance within solar Fraunhofer lines and is another data product from OCO-2. RESULTS: The measurements from OCO-2 provide a global view of the seasonal cycles and spatial patterns of atmospheric CO 2, with the anticipated year-over-year growth rate. The buildup of CO 2 in the Northern Hemisphere during winter and its rapid decrease in concentration as spring arrives (and the SIF increases) is seen in unprecedented detail. The enhanced CO 2 in urban areas relative to nearby background areas is observed with a single overpass of OCO-2. Increases in CO 2 due to the biomass burning in Africa are also clearly observed. The dense, global,XCO2 and SIF data sets from OCO-2 are combined with other remote sensing data sets and used to disentangle the processes driving the carbon cycle on regional scales during the recent 2015–2016 El Niño event. This analysis shows more carbon release in 2015 relative to 2011 over Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia. Now, the fundamental driver for the change in carbon release can be assessed continent by continent, rather than treating the tropics as a single, integrated region. Small changes in XCO2 were also observed early in the El Niño over the equatorial eastern Pacific, due to less upwelling of cold, carbon-rich water than is typical. CONCLUSION: NASA’s OCO-2 mission is collecting a dense, global set of high-spectral resolution measurements that are used to estimate XCO2 and SIF. The OCO-2 mission data set can now be used to assess regional-scale sources and sinks of CO 2 around the globe. The papers in this collection present early scientific findings from this new data set. El Niño impact on carbon flux in 2015 relative to 2011, detected from Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and OCO-2 data.: OCO-2 uses reflected sunlight to derive XCO2 and SIF. This shows OCO-2 XCO2 data over North America from 12 August 2015 to 26 August 2015.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Intercomparison
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3800.1 · Cited by 2,902
Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models
Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., & Wennberg, P. O. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011 · Cited by 2,047
Self-citation
Cited by
Recent global decline of CO 2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis
Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Ju, W., Chen, J. M., Ciais, P., Cescatti, A., Sardans, J., Janssens, I. A., Wu, M., Berry, J. A., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb7772 · Cited by 697
Permafrost carbon emissions in a changing Arctic
Miner, K. R., Turetsky, M. R., Malina, E., Bartsch, A., Tamminen, J., McGuire, A. D., Fix, A., Sweeney, C., Elder, C. D., & Miller, C. E. (2022) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00230-3 · Cited by 538
Self-citationInterannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives
Piao, S., Wang, X., Wang, K., Li, X., Bastos, A., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Friedlingstein, P., & Sitch, S. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14884 · Cited by 486
Mechanistic evidence for tracking the seasonality of photosynthesis with solar-induced fluorescence
Magney, T. S., Bowling, D. R., Logan, B. A., Grossmann, K., Stutz, J., Blanken, P. D., Burns, S. P., Cheng, R., Garcia, M. A., Kӧhler, P., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900278116 · Cited by 435
Self-citationSchneider, T., Lan, S., Stuart, A., & Teixeira, J. (2017) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl076101 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Eldering, A., Wennberg, P. O., Crisp, D., Schimel, D. S., Gunson, M. R., Chatterjee, A., Liu, J., Schwandner, F. M., Sun, Y., O’Dell, C. W., Frankenberg, C., Taylor, T., Fisher, B., Osterman, G. B., Wunch, D., Hakkarainen, J., Tamminen, J., & Weir, B.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2017-10-13
- Volume
- 358
- Issue
- 6360
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2762558415
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 early science investigations of regional carbon dioxide fluxes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aam5745
- The paper
- Eldering, A., Wennberg, P. O., Crisp, D., Schimel, D. S., Gunson, M. R., Chatterjee, A., Liu, J., Schwandner, F. M., Sun, Y., O’Dell, C. W., Frankenberg, C., Taylor, T., Fisher, B., Osterman, G. B., Wunch, D., Hakkarainen, J., Tamminen, J., & Weir, B. (2017). The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 early science investigations of regional carbon dioxide fluxes. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5745
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.