Cited by 377Epigenetics and DNA MethylationChromatin Remodeling and CancerHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research

The cancer epigenome: Concepts, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities

Dawson, Mark A.·2017·Science

Abstract

Cancer biology is profoundly influenced by changes in the epigenome. Because the dynamic plasticity of the epigenome lends itself well to therapeutic manipulation, the past few years have witnessed an unprecedented investment in the development, characterization, and translation of targeted epigenetic therapies. In this review, I provide a broad context for recent developments that offer a greater understanding of how epigenetic regulators facilitate the initiation, maintenance, and evolution of cancer. I discuss newly developed epigenetic therapies and the cellular and molecular mechanisms that may govern sensitivity and resistance to these agents. I also review the rationale for future combination therapies involving existing and emerging epigenetic drugs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aam7304

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Response rates of up to 60% to azacytidine have been reported in MDS.

    “Whilst response rates of up to 60% to azacytidine have been reported in MDS 125,129 ,”
  • The prolonged time to initial response, typically around 3 months from treatment onset, is consistent with the primary effects of low dose treatment being mediated via DNA demethylation and epigenetic reprogramming as opposed to direct cytotoxicity.

    “The prolonged time to initial response, which typically occurs around 3 months from treatment onset 125 , is consistent with the primary effects of low dose treatment being mediated via DNA demethylation and epigenetic reprogramming as opposed to direct cytotoxicity 126-128 .”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 377

Authors
Dawson, M. A.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Dawson, Mark A.
Venue
Science
Published
2017-03-17
Volume
355
Issue
6330
Pages
1147-1152
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2596054989
Cited by
377
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 22
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1066545, 1085015, 1106444, 1106447)
  • Leukaemia Foundation (Fellowship)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Keywords
cancer epigenome, epigenetic regulators, epigenetic drug resistance, combination therapy, epigenetic drugs
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Humans, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, Mutation, Neoplasms, Transcription, Genetic, Drug Design, DNA Methylation, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Epigenesis, Genetic, Small Molecule Libraries, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review