Waste disposal—An attractive strategy for cancer therapy
Abstract
Targeted therapies for cancer are typically small molecules or monoclonal antibodies that act by inhibiting the activity of specific proteins that drive tumor growth. Although many of these drugs are effective in cancer patients, the response is often not durable because tumor cells develop resistance to the drugs. Another limitation of this strategy is that not all oncogenic driver proteins are “druggable” enzymes or receptors with activities that can be inhibited. Here we describe an alternative approach to targeted therapy that is based on co-opting the cellular quality-control machinery—the ubiquitin-proteasome system—to remove specific cancer-causing proteins from the cell. We first discuss examples of existing cancer drugs that work by degrading specific proteins and then review recent progress in the rational design and preclinical testing of small molecules that induce selective degradation of specific target proteins.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most efforts in the TPD field focus on degraders that co-opt the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS).
“Significant attention has been given to degraders that hijack the autophagy machinery;40−42 however, most efforts in the field focus on degraders that co-opt the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS).43”
From Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 279
- Authors
- Salami, J., & Crews, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crews, Craig M.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2017-03-17
- Volume
- 355
- Issue
- 6330
- Pages
- 1163-1167
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2596306432
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (164667)
- National Cancer Institute (R35CA197589)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Keywords
- targeted cancer therapy, protein degradation, ubiquitin-proteasome system, selective protein degradation, small-molecule degraders, drug resistance, rational drug design, proteasome inhibitors
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Agents, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Morpholines, Neoplasms, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Ubiquitin, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Small Molecule Libraries, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review