Cited by 519Forensic and Genetic ResearchPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyGenetic diversity and population structure

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Southern African ancient genomes estimate modern human divergence to 350,000 to 260,000 years ago

Abstract

Ancient DNA pushes human emergence back: Anatomically modern humans evolved in Africa, but pinpointing when has been difficult. Schlebusch et al. sequenced three ancient African genomes from the Stone Age, about 2000 years old, and four from the Iron Age, 300 to 500 years old. One of the oldest samples, sequenced to 13× coverage, appears most closely to resemble individuals from the present-day San population. However, this individual seems to have lacked genetic contributions from other modern African populations, including pastoralists and farmers, which were observed in modern San individuals. Thus, the earliest divergence between human populations may have occurred 350,000 to 260,000 years ago. Science , this issue p. 652

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aao6266

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 105 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. M. Lombard L. Wadley, J. Deacon, S. Wurz, I. Parsons, M. Mohapi, South African and Lesotho Stone Age sequence updated. S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull. 67, 123–144 (2012).
  2. P. Vinnicombe A Bushman hunting kit from the Natal Drakensberg. Annals Natal Museum 20 611–625 (1971). http://www.sahumanities.org/ojs/index.php/SAH/article/view/65
  3. R. Albino Note on the excavation of a rock shelter at Champagne Castle Natal. Annals Natal Museum 11 157–160 (1947). http://www.sahumanities.org/ojs/index.php/SAH/article/view/62
  4. 10.1101/100297 · DOI
  5. C. M. Schlebusch thesis University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg (2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 518

Metadata

Authors
Schlebusch, C. M., Malmström, H., Günther, T., Sjödin, P., Coutinho, A., Edlund, H., Munters, A. R., Vicente, M., Steyn, M., Soodyall, H., Lombard, M., & Jakobsson, M.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
  • University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Schlebusch, Carina M.
  • Malmström, Helena
  • Lombard, Marlize
  • Jakobsson, Mattias
Venue
Science
Published
2017-11-03
Volume
358
Issue
6363
Pages
652-655
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2760172958
Cited by
519
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 7
FWCI
32.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wenner-Gren Foundation (award344363)
  • Göran Gustafssons Stiftelse för Naturvetenskaplig och Medicinsk Forskning (award344362)
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (award344359)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (award344360, 642-2013-8019, award344361, 621-2014-5211)
  • South African National Research Foundation (award344364)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
ancient human genomes, Bantu population, genetic admixture, KwaZulu-Natal, Southern Africa
MeSH terms
DNA, Ancient, Biological Evolution, Humans, South Africa, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review