Cited by 367Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic diversity and population structure

Identity inference of genomic data using long-range familial searches

Open access
Erlich, Yaniv, Shor, Tal, Pe’er, Itsik, Carmi, Shai·2018·Science

Abstract

Detecting familial matches: Recent advances in DNA technology and companies that provide array-based testing have led to services that collect, share, and analyze volunteered genomic information. Privacy concerns have been raised, especially in light of the use of these services by law enforcement to identify suspects in criminal cases. Testing models of relatedness, Erlich et al. show that many individuals of European ancestry in the United States—even those that have not undergone genetic testing—can be identified on the basis of available genetic information. These results indicate a need for procedures to help maintain genetic privacy for individuals. Science , this issue p. 690

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aau4832

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A minimum threshold of greater than 6 cMs was used as a reliable proof of biological relationships because shorter segments could be identical by state rather than identical by descent.

    “For this study, a minimum threshold > 6 cMs was used as a reliable proof of biological relationships [33], because shorter segments could be the results of chance (identical by state or IBS) and not necessarily the result of a genealogical relationship (identical by descent or IBD).”

    From Resolving a 150-year-old paternity case in Mormon history using DTC autosomal DNA testing of distant relatives. (2019) · cites this paper as [33]

    The paper’s Abstract says it retained relatives sharing at least two IBD segments greater than 6 cM each to increase the chance of correctly inferring genealogical relationships. It does not call a single segment above 6 cM reliable proof of a relationship or explain the threshold by saying shorter segments could be identical by state. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even when sensitive patient data are anonymized, certain algorithms can still identify individual patients.

    “Other studies have shown that, even when sensitive patient data are anonymized, certain algorithms can still identify individual patients [189-191].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 367

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Department of Health and Human Services, Fed. Regist 82, 7149– 7274 (2017). 28106360

Authors
Erlich, Y., Shor, T., Pe’er, I., & Carmi, S.
Affiliations
  • New York Genome Center (US)
  • MyHeritage, Or Yehuda 6037606, Israel.
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Erlich, Yaniv
Venue
Science
Published
2018-11-09
Volume
362
Issue
6415
Pages
690-694
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2895917461
Cited by
367
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
29.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Burroughs Wellcome Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
identity inference, law enforcement, distant relatives, European ancestry, privacy policies, human subjects research
MeSH terms
Family Relations, Humans, Pedigree, Genomics, Databases, Genetic, Genetic Privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review