Natural climate solutions are not enough
Abstract
Decarbonizing the economy must remain a critical priority
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SOC sequestration cannot substitute emission reductions, even temporarily, nor does it delay the need for immediate and aggressive cuts in greenhouse gas emissions if we are to keep global warming under 1.5 or well-below 2°C.
“SOC sequestration cannot substitute emission reductions, even temporarily, nor does it delay the need for immediate and aggressive cuts in greenhouse gas emissions if we are to keep global warming under 1.5 or well- below 2°C (Anderson et al., 2019).”
From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as Anderson et al., 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 12 · Cited by 165
- Authors
- Anderson, C. M., DeFries, R. S., Litterman, R., Matson, P. A., Nepstad, D. C., Pacala, S., Schlesinger, W. H., Shaw, M. R., Smith, P., Weber, C., & Field, C. B.
- Affiliations
- World Wildlife Fund (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Kepos Capital, New York, NY, USA.
- Stanford University (US)
- Earth Innovation Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Princeton University (US)
- Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 363
- Issue
- 6430
- Pages
- 933-934
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2917625801
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 26.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/M021327/1, NE/P019455/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- natural climate solutions, climate change mitigation, decarbonization, carbon sequestration, climate policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
