Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Design of higher valency in covalent organic frameworks

Gropp, Cornelius, Ma, Tianqiong, Hanikel, Nikita, Yaghi, Omar M.·2020·Science

Abstract

Higher-valency ligands for COFs: Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have exhibited more extensive connectivity (valency) and topological diversity than covalent organic frameworks (COFs), mainly because MOF linkers can connect from 3 to 24 discrete units or even infinity for one-dimensional rods. For COFs, linkers generally have a valency of 3 or 4 that reflect the valency of organic carbon. Gropp et al. created cubane-like linkers from 1,4-boronophenylphosphonic acid that could condense to make COFs with a valency of 8 or, by adding acid, could form large, single crystals with an infinite-rod topology. Science , this issue p. eabd6406

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abd6406

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Gropp, C., Ma, T., Hanikel, N., & Yaghi, O. M.
Venue
Science
Published
2020-10-23
Volume
370
Issue
6515
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3094427434
Cited by
349
References
4
FWCI
15.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design of higher valency in covalent organic frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.abd6406
The paper
Gropp, C., Ma, T., Hanikel, N., & Yaghi, O. M. (2020). Design of higher valency in covalent organic frameworks. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd6406

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.