Cited by 49Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationRace, History, and American SocietyPolitical Theory and Democracy

Racial authoritarianism in U.S. democracy

Weaver, Vesla M., Prowse, Gwen·2020·Science

Abstract

One segment of the population experiences different rules and differential citizenship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abd7669

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coercive state authority, such as authoritarian policing and mass incarceration, is mostly administered with state-level authority.

    “Coercive state authority, seen in extreme forms in authoritarian policing and mass incarceration, are also mostly administered with state-level authority (Miller 2008; Soss and Weaver 2017; Weaver and Prowse 2020).”

    From Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding (2023) · cites this paper as Weaver and Prowse 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weaver, V. M., & Prowse, G.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2020-09-04
Volume
369
Issue
6508
Pages
1176-1178
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3083213901
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
16.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
racial inequality, racial discrimination, democracy, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review