Cited by 46COVID-19 epidemiological studiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Networks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission

Cevik, Muge, Baral, Stefan D.·2021·Science

Abstract

Individual and network heterogeneity should inform respiratory pandemic responses

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abg0842

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cevik, M., & Baral, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Infection and Global Health Division, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2021-07-09
Volume
373
Issue
6551
Pages
162-163
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3178504470
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, transmission networks, network heterogeneity, individual heterogeneity, pandemic response, contact networks
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Communicable Disease Control, Family Characteristics, Health Policy, Humans, Minority Groups, Occupations, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Basic Reproduction Number, Health Status Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review